[-] El_Dorado@beehaw.org 3 points 11 months ago

Yeah I thought first it's a good news post...

[-] El_Dorado@beehaw.org 17 points 11 months ago

I guess they just have huge numbers available also due to the fact that almost all women and men are in the military service and hence reservists

[-] El_Dorado@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

Comment for visibility of this

[-] El_Dorado@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

I'd love to know that as well. So if you guys have any news let's have it

[-] El_Dorado@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

What if the cop is a cute girl?

[-] El_Dorado@beehaw.org 19 points 1 year ago

That's the lovely bit about putting a bill out there. The enforcement and feasibility is not the problem of the politicians anymore.

[-] El_Dorado@beehaw.org 10 points 1 year ago

Well all you can say is bye bye and good luck

[-] El_Dorado@beehaw.org 53 points 1 year ago

Haha yes definitely something to follow. I'm looking forward to lists of companies that left UK because of this (as announced) and lists of companies that stay and thus prove that their end-to-end encryption isn't a real one

[-] El_Dorado@beehaw.org 30 points 1 year ago

People hate the common asshole wasp. Most people don't know that other nicer wasps exists 😂

[-] El_Dorado@beehaw.org 55 points 1 year ago

Haha yes also incredibly that they had to point out this sentence "Tech companies have said scanning messages and end-to-end encryption are fundamentally incompatible."

Very astonishing how there are some fundamental lacks of understanding from politicians advertising this. Or all on purpose

[-] El_Dorado@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Sure it's original from the US but national geographics has very international topics. Already their headline story at the moment is about Rhino's

262
submitted 1 year ago by El_Dorado@beehaw.org to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
[-] El_Dorado@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago

A little disappointing after the unspecified title. The article only refers to north American cities.

39
submitted 1 year ago by El_Dorado@beehaw.org to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

I was reading about the allegations against Russell Brand and couldn't help but wonder how it works legally that his revenue can be blocked based on allegations and before any juridical ruling.

Don't get me wrong I don't know much about the guy and what he did or didn't do and agree that anyone should be punished according to their crimes.

But how is this possible with the principal of innocent until proven guilty? I'd be happy if someone could explain me.

14
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by El_Dorado@beehaw.org to c/lemmyconnect@lemmy.ca

Hello and thanks for the great work on connect.

Just some feedback for gifs in connect. I use the latest version 1.0.141 on android.

There seems to be an issue regarding data consumption. I realized that the app uses huge amount of data when playing gifs. So I tested and an embedded gif that was consuming almost 200mb in the app actually only consumes 40mb when played in Firefox on the original hosting website.

Also the app is quite huge with 0.9 gb on the phone storage. Is this normal? This seems to be alot for an app thats probably doesn't have to cache much data.

It would be awesome if you could have a look into this.

Many thanks

... Edit: spelling

9
11
view more: next ›

El_Dorado

joined 1 year ago