Endward23

I wonder how long this ruling will hold if the EU commision comes around with their own chat control. Before somebody write it: I know that the EU and the Human Rights Court are different institution and doesn't have much to do with each another.

The Russian state has already left the European agreement, which was the frame in which the court works.

At least, it should be interesting to check the judgment out. Some aspects are really interesting. As it seems, the european court may development a ruling like Bernstein v. United States. That could be interesting since the european continent lackes such a regulation as far as I know.

I think, it's an mixture:

• Clickbait
• Some ethicans want to do an important role
• Hollywood movies and so on have teached us so. What could be a better source of informations to build owns worldview on it?
• Some writers hope to creat a social enviroment in which the discussion to ban the new technology starts in order to keep the jobs in their industry.
• Some political figures want to outlaw AI and found peoples and groups which are against it.

Maybe, the last point is not true at all. And the named writers, of cource, arn't full aware of their agency. Its, as often, more on a emotional ground.

Before I start to reading the article: Why not start by NPCs in MMORPGs?

At least, it could nobody be harmed.

It’s hard to believe human beings living regular lives are doing this kind of thing.

What?

Great piece of art.

Check it out here: https://www.uni-jena.de/en/all-news/neural-networks-made-of-light

And there is a reference at the end:

B. Fischer, M. Chemnitz, Y. Zhu, N. Perron, P. Roztocki, B. MacLellan, L. Di Lauro, A. Aadhi, C. Rimoldi, T. H. Falk, R. Morandotti: Neuromorphic Computing via Fission-based Broadband Frequency Generation. Adv. Sci. 2023, 10, 2303835. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202303835

This magazine has a good impact factor as far as a quick search shows.

This just sounds like UBI with extra steps, and not very universal, as there won’t be as many “machine observing” jobs as there were jobs which the machine replaced.

You can make more and more bureaucracy. Someone must traine the machine observer, someone supervise them etc. There are no limits for the imagination.

Why not free up the newly unemployable portion of the population to pursue their passions and enjoy life, rather than mandating the existence of silly jobs for the sake of jobs?

I think it would be a problem with inflation and so on.

“I do this for good reasons, trust me” is not a valid argument.

Yes. The problem is, when one country has had a intelligence agency and the other has not, the one with the agency has a advantage. At least, under the same conditions.

I see the tension between a republican (res publica, "thing of the public") State and the existence of such secrets. The question is if a state without this could exist under the current circumstances. There are a lot room for doubts here, I fear.

Not all of us lived in America.

I never say that. Thats a straw man-argument.

That’s true, but if robots are cheaper than humans, no company would employ humans for the sole purpose of being customers. That’s not how companies work. Any company which does so will quickly lose to a competitor which doesn’t.

Thats just half true. You overlook cases like bureaucracy or neptonism, when people help others into companies.

It would be esay for the US gouverment to force companies to hire persons, even for silly activities like "machine observing". You just need to make a Act of Congress which requieres something that needs a human. Doesn't matter. The cooperations would make an effort to hire really humans, in order to prevent a lawsuid. The courts would just say, "okay, this is the federal law, any cooperation which makes a trade between the States needs to follow it". Some applies for the EU, China, Japan etc.

Is this less efficient than a AI based system? Sure. They will make some exaptions.