Endward23

The new technology has advantages and disadvantages. If you argue just from this angle, the gouverment comes to bad ideas like just to prohibit AI.

Lol

You can say the same about classical media like books or TV. Maybe, AI is more persuading?

Sounds like a lot of hight mathematics.

Its really a interesting piece. Thanks!

But this can be the causal root of the recent changes. Populations aren't declining because of famine, but because people aren't having more children.

Your argument need some middle step or mediator like "people already realizing the comming problems and react with getting less childeren". But is this really the case? I mean, we observe the decline even in places like north korea or by groups who denied clima change or simply don't care.

Maybe, the emerging problems of clima change are part of the creation of a pessimistic worldview or something.

Capitalism is growth based. It requires infinite growth in order to operate normally, and we are on a finite planet.

I see your point but for "academic reasons", is there any proof of this claim.

Nothing within socialism points to growth of any kind, and well-structured socialism can even function well under degrowth conditions.

have to disagree strongly.

• Older individuals needs help from the socity in order to survive and have goods like clothes and so on.
• The help in questions has to be provided my at least middle aged individuals. They must spend resources like money, energy etc. on it.
• If you have significant more older individuals than younger ones, you got a really problem with the resources.

Even a socialistic society has to follow this logic since their resources, like the workforce of younger people, are limited.

The situation we'll face in the near future, the situation of having more and more older individuals, while we need resources for a lot of other fields like AI, political stuff and clima, would be problem in any human society. In every society which suffer the problem of limited resources.

Thank you for your long answer. Even if it doesn't contain the answer I looking for.

nd even if your mixmaster or tor traffic is really anonymized (which is dubious), the fact you are using such services at all probably flags you for attention.

I think so, too. But in my imagination, one who uses tor or a remailer is just a short flash on the radar. If it doesn't follow more, they would not investigate further. Since 90% or so of all tor users doesn't do anything bad. Even agencies doesn't like wasting of time and resources.

If you just want to exchange email with your friend when you are both on the down low, you might be best off just both enrolling gmail accounts.

With Google, I think, it will nearly 100% sure that it is tracked somehow. If both sides have no problem with this, its fine.

Plus, a lot of attention in the crypto nerd world shifted over to things like bitcoin.

Never considered this angle. Thanks for this.

I have heard there was a recent development in single server PIR (private information retrieval).

I remember, I have read, over 5 years ago, a PDF-File from a German university about this. It was a so called "blinded read"-method.

I have a vagly idea how this can work but I lack the mathematical knowleade to explain it further.

Interesting.

Agree to disagree?

Google "Deep Bach".

Music is the area of art in which a mathematical viewpoint makes the best sense.