Lemmy try: !internetisbeautiful@lemmy.ml

PS: works 😁

I visit some subs occasionally on old reddit, but have never logged in again. Fuck u/spez.

Considering that training is extracting the main features of a dataset, there is always some data that is discarded as "noise" in the process, then when data is generated, that discarded information is filled back with actual random noise to partially replicate the original data.

Iterate and you're going to end up with progressively less meaningful features. I just didn't expect it to take only 5 iterations, that's a lot of feature loss in training even with so many parameters.

It wasn't that bad, gold just signals that the comment is good (intensity), but some of the other awards made explicit the way in which it is good (hue/flavour) e.g. funny, informative, creative, sarcastic...I actually liked the award system (even if I always was a bit suspicious of who was giving them and what their intentions were)

Because he used his money to turn a townsquare into truthsocial 2.0 and now is paying trolls to stoke division. He is not a good actor.

PS: just to be more explicit: there are amoral people who screw you over without even noticing it, that's how the game was set up, ok. But that is not what Elon is doing. This guy went out of his fucking way and took a loss to ruin a platform for everyone. Think about that. Imagine going out of your way to hurt yourself so you can hurt others more. And this guy says he wants to manage a Mars colony and lead humanity into the future. Please, Jesus, no.

Knoppix in 2nd year at Uni. It made me more productive because there were few distractions from programming. So zen.

Great examples there, particularly firefox. The moral here is that there is no black-and-white or even a spectrum from community to corporate, but a set of incentive structures from the bottom to the top that are set up to maximize the likelihood that a product will reach its originally desired behaviour towards the community or the investors.

Meta: this post needs to be a community.

E.g. Wikipedia is community-driven because people contribute individually without a lot of coordination and without anybody telling contributors what to do, same for game mods. I guess by "corporate-driven" you mean there is a hierarchy and people whose job it is to do what management says e.g. Wikipedia foundation runs the infrastructure that hosts the community content and the same for most games. I'm not sure I'd call it "corporate driven" unless it has board members and investors demanding a profit such that they influence the decisions downstream, like reddit.

It's a bit like the whole "infrastructure ain't sexy" argument. As the chief executive administrator, you're paid to "strategize", when sometimes, you just need to keep the engines running and the bills paid, but in today's society that's not praised. You need to capture people and investors' ADHD-span, make megalomanous plans that can't possibly ever come true or be some guy who fires everyone to attempt to grow profit margins.

Is this Bard (the one in the article) or old chatGPT?

I don't know whether to think it's a miracle that they haven't shut down my email addresses or worry about how much money they're making off reading my email compared with all the good products they deemed unprofitable.