Conventional weapons can reduce hoards to manageable amount. And a zombie dragging itself across the ground is much easier to deal with.

If I saw thousands of zombies, a machine gun is what I want. Aim head at the average head height, and make the barrels smoke. It's not suppressing fire, it's crowd management.

Remember you can spike a zombie on the ground easier than when they are standing. Immobilise, THEN neutralise.

Artillery and bombs can shred/destroy the body, making it hard to move, if there is enough body left to move.

A .50 to the arm isn't going to slow a zombie down, but the knee? Kinda hard to walk with one leg. 25mm chain gun is probably going to mist a few bodies.

Artillery is an area denial weapon. If you have a hoard a couple 105 shells are going to take apart rotten flesh with ease. Mortars are similar and more mobile.

Mine fields are effective as a way to immobilise and thin the herd.

Choke points work exceptionally well, and claymores can be rigged at head height.

If they are trying to protect women from "men" in sports shouldn't they prevent "women" playing with men? One would think they would be at the same risk...

This sounds like a terrible bill. Also it's sexist as all fuck, why not prevent trans athletes in male sports as welll?

Ah, yes, wasn't focused on that part. Pretty sure 1.3 billion would be most of both American continents.

Not all Billionaires are American.

Are Billionaires a cultural or ethnic group? Because if not it's just sparkling mass murder...

That Palestinian child is going to be horrified that I let Taylor swift die.

Russia doesn't want to use certain groups as cannon fodder.

Still need infrastructure for mass transit.

Busses still need roads and rails need maintenance.

The exception that proves the rule?

Anything to tug at heartstrings and manufacture consent for the genocide.