Im14abeer

joined 1 year ago
[–] Im14abeer@midwest.social -4 points 1 year ago

So both sides then? If so, I've been mostly voting wrong. Ayn, they're all coming around! Tell Keynes he was right and that we love him!

[–] Im14abeer@midwest.social -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Interest capped for all borrowers. Bond backed government loans with no for profit middleman. Support for dual enrollment, AP and other means of obtaining college credits in general subject matter. Loan debt dischargeable in bankruptcy for private loans. Income based, sliding scale tuition at public universities instead of bigger loans for those who come from lesser means. People forget many of these public universities that cost 30k a year were land grant colleges established for the education of the public in the public's interest.

Edit; the whole income based tuition sentence I somehow cut out in the original.

[–] Im14abeer@midwest.social -2 points 1 year ago

Did you read the last sentence of my reply? I made a specific suggestion at a non targeted approach and suggested addressing the root of the problem. Biden's actions bellie his motives.

[–] Im14abeer@midwest.social -4 points 1 year ago

I think you've got me pegged wrong. You can't cut my taxes, the country spends 2 trillion dollars more than it takes in every year. I believe universal health care is the only way out of the cost spiral. This country faces crises on multiple fronts and most of them worsen every day. But do tell how a narrowly targeted loan forgiveness is in the general public's interest versus more broad reform. Then do PPP loans.

[–] Im14abeer@midwest.social -3 points 1 year ago

Brilliant reply, truly thought provoking. Short enough for you?

[–] Im14abeer@midwest.social -4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Well shit, I could be the most popular politician ever then. I wonder why no one has thought to just buy off every voter? What guise would you like your funds funneled to you under? One by one I'll win you all over.

[–] Im14abeer@midwest.social -3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Benefits the economic reality of SOME of the working class. It just so happens he's courting those voters, and in this case successfully traded taxpayer's funds for support. It's not less wrong when you personally like the outcome.

[–] Im14abeer@midwest.social -3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Conversely, Biden supported the 2005 bill that made student loan debt nearly impossible to discharge in bankruptcy. I know this isn't a popular opinion around these parts, but the terms of these loans weren't a secret, picking and choosing who to relieve of them via the public coffers is akin to attempting to buy votes. He should have capped interest rates for all existing loans and worked for future reform so this doesn't remain a problem.

[–] Im14abeer@midwest.social -4 points 1 year ago

In Biden's case, the criterion is he's not Trump. Otherwise, he's a shitheel politician, always has been. He does like to tout his bonafides though. It would be a good story if there weren't decades of evidence of his suckalige. If it weren't for Obama's popularity and Trump's ineptitude, no one would give Biden the time of day. He appeals to virtually no one, which is why he has to buy votes and "no true Scotsman" black people.

[–] Im14abeer@midwest.social -4 points 1 year ago

Essentially, yes. Don't take this as an endorsement, Trump was likely the worst president this country has ever seen, truly a national embarrassment, but he (really they) lowered individual taxes for most wage earners also (temporarily). You can't really rail on republican stupidity, immorality, selfishness etc. if we're all just going to vote as currency in trade. Funny how Randian people become when their selfish want is being fufilled.

view more: ‹ prev next ›