[-] InternetPerson@lemmings.world 18 points 12 hours ago

If it's about those pretty similar character models like those linked in the article, then I can understand Nintendo better.
But if it's just about the concept of "collecting monsters" and using them in battles somehow, then they can go fuck themselves. I'm eager to learn where they see their patents infringed.

[-] InternetPerson@lemmings.world 2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Note however, that psychotropics drugs are best taken under medical instruction and are most effective in the long run if you're also in psychotherapy.

Edit: Wtf did my app just do

[-] InternetPerson@lemmings.world 4 points 14 hours ago

There are a lot of different species which serve as pollinators besides bees. Afaik, some are more specialised into specific flowers/plants than others and without them, these plants wouldn't be able to reproduce. (Yucca moths for example.)

[-] InternetPerson@lemmings.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

It was already ruled that they failed to sufficiently disclose which information was used and how.

https://www.reuters.com/technology/australia-court-fines-facebook-owner-meta-14-mln-undisclosed-data-collection-2023-07-26/

[-] InternetPerson@lemmings.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

This is not evidence that they’re using your microphone, and you know it’s not.

I didn't claim it to be evidence for that.

somehow bypassing Google and Apple’s mic usage notifications

Unless some form of hardware notification is hardwired into the device, which indicates cam or mic usage, I'm on the rather paranoid side regarding software notifications. Software is usually much easier to break. I'm leaning a lot out of the window now, as I don't know how secure those notifications are implemented. However, even then there is reason for concern, given that facebook had / has questionable deals with device manufacturers. If they were willing to share personal data with device manufacturers, there is reason to suspect this went or can go the other way around as well.

I don’t know why you keep coming back to trust. [...] That’s not the point.

It is mine. Even though there is no evidence for a surveillance using device microphones itself yet and it could be surprising if they were able to, given the history of facebook, they participated in a lot of rather surprising shit.

[-] InternetPerson@lemmings.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Aye. Facebook has been proven to be shady af over and over again.

[-] InternetPerson@lemmings.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

it wasn’t in secret

Did I misread something? It even says in the title of the linked article, that it was a "secret project".

[-] InternetPerson@lemmings.world -2 points 2 weeks ago

The evidence is: among other things, facebook has repeatedly violated user's privacy. It would be no surprise if they would also monitor conversations via the microphone. Sure, currently there seems to be no evidence for that. But I wouldn't be so naive to just trust them on that.

[-] InternetPerson@lemmings.world -3 points 2 weeks ago

Yes. Just another malicious thing facebook does. Surely, they are totally trustworthy in all other regards. /s

[-] InternetPerson@lemmings.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

Security researchers can and probably have tested for this and found no clear, verifiable evidence, otherwise we would have known.

Facebook snooped on users’ Snapchat traffic in secret project, documents reveal

view more: next ›

InternetPerson

joined 5 months ago