sorted by: new top controversial old
Does ActivityPub need URL schema(s)? in c/fediverse@lemmy.world
[-] JoeGermuska@midwest.social 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I've been thinking a lot about the modality differences between microblogging and forums, and still working out my thoughts, but I definitely agree that generic solutions end up failing everyone.

I'd like to believe that today's practice isn't yet so cemented that we can't aspire to better. I think there's a lot of interop work even among conceptually aligned projects -- there are a couple of FEPs i haven't digested yet, eg FEP-1b12: Group federation (as well as, I just found, one about URLs)

I think the targets I'm looking for are a unified feed that can fan out to specialized clients for detail, and a system that embraces the power of links with minimal friction. EDIT oh, and maybe something that makes it easier to follow specific people across different modalities without having to rediscover them -- although maybe that's adjacent to the topic of this thread

Does ActivityPub need URL schema(s)? in c/fediverse@lemmy.world
[-] JoeGermuska@midwest.social 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I was pointed to this proposal for fedi: from Tim Bray, which I'd missed, and found a commenter pointing back to this advocating for acct:, which leaves the question of linking to posts kinda vague

EDIT: adding FEP-07d7: A Custom URL Scheme and Web-Based Protocol Handlers for Linking to ActivityPub Resources ( discussion )

Does ActivityPub need URL schema(s)? in c/fediverse@lemmy.world
[-] JoeGermuska@midwest.social 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Thanks for the thoughtful response.

You can’t exactly expect the URL to indicate the type

Yes, this seems like one of the bigger hitches. I've never investigated, but I wonder if the git+ssh plan is formalized, and whether it is an option

A smarter app could detect the type of server responsible for managing certain things (i.e. when you’re following a Lemmy community, treat posts in it as such, and not as a flat timeline), …

Seems a mistake to me too imagine that the future of ActivityPub is servers limited to specific certain content types?

Need to think more about the client/server parts of your post, but again, thanks for taking the time

57
Does ActivityPub need URL schema(s)? (midwest.social)
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by JoeGermuska@midwest.social to c/fediverse@lemmy.world
16 comments fedilink

I just had that problem when you browse to a Mastodon post and ⭐️ it, or try to follow someone. The choreography is clumsy, and the kind of thing that will hinder mainstream adoption of ActivityPub.

acct is IANA official and used behind the scenes with webfinger. It'd be dead-simple to enable browsers looking up an app to handle acct: URLs: an ActivityPub client.

It's trickier to think of how to handle posts, given the discussion about Lemmy/Mastodon interop… and the ActivityStreams spec has a dozen object types! But I think I'm going to want only as many clients as necessary, and one sounds great, so I'm interested to hear what people are thinking at an infrastructure level

The 15 Best Hard Sci-Fi Movies That Define the Genre in c/sciencefiction@lemmy.world
A game to play around the holiday table in c/lotrmemes@midwest.social

JoeGermuska

joined 1 year ago