JustSomePerson

joined 1 year ago
[–] JustSomePerson@kbin.social 1 points 9 months ago

You're right. I read the first graph too quickly.

[–] JustSomePerson@kbin.social -1 points 9 months ago (3 children)

If it had used "Left" it would. The established color of "Liberal" is yellow, and liberals are people who believe society should be run for profit.

[–] JustSomePerson@kbin.social -3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Fuck them for calling the left liberal. Liberals are the people who sell schools, hospitals, and social services to the lowest bidding private enterprise. A solidly right wing ideology that puts profit over people.

[–] JustSomePerson@kbin.social 24 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Why Buy Anything Else?

It seems to be the size of an air craft carrier.

[–] JustSomePerson@kbin.social 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)

That's your problem as a consumer accepting that. This thread makes me depressed, with the amount of people happy to allow shitty US consumer hostile practices to become more common globally.

[–] JustSomePerson@kbin.social 1 points 9 months ago (15 children)

Keeping my number. Are you saying that I can immediately, online, get my existing number connected to a different handset? If I can't, then that's why I want to transfer the physical SIM.

[–] JustSomePerson@kbin.social 7 points 9 months ago (21 children)

Exactly. What a shitty anti-feature. Your answer proves that the people saying that "eSIMs are functionally the same as normal SIM" are full of absolute shit.

[–] JustSomePerson@kbin.social 5 points 9 months ago (24 children)

I don't want a "new sim", I want my old one, which doesn't exist anymore since it was virtual and only existed in my now broken previous phone. How does it work in that situation?

[–] JustSomePerson@kbin.social 7 points 9 months ago (4 children)

The major function of a normal SIM is the ability to take it out of one device and put it into another one, effectively disconnecting my identity towards the network provider, from the handset. With eSIM, that doesn't exist, and if my phone breaks, it's unclear what happens.

To me, that's not secure, that's unsafe and insecure.

[–] JustSomePerson@kbin.social 1 points 9 months ago

That is entirely irrelevant to the discussion here. The person I am responding to is arguing that we somehow could transform into a society where nobody has to work. Not one where everybody who works today still works, but with fairer and better distribution of the produced output.

[–] JustSomePerson@kbin.social -3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Which means they either need to be worked, i.e. labor is needed; or there is scarcity of food and goods. Neither option results in a post-scarcity society.

view more: ‹ prev next ›