JustSomePerson

joined 1 year ago
[–] JustSomePerson@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Where are you? I'm late Gen X in Sweden, and there wasn't a second of doubt for me.

[–] JustSomePerson@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Enshrining racial differences in the constitution is absolutely disgusting, no matter how good your intentions are.

[–] JustSomePerson@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nobody is proving an endorsement of monarchy. You're using monarchy as an argument for adding (additional) racism to the constitution. It's a fucking stupid argument. "One thing is bad, therefore it is not a problem to make other things worse too."

If something has a flaw (monarchy) that's not a reason to make it worse (enshrine racially based representation).

[–] JustSomePerson@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

They had that in parts of Europe for a year now as a trial. But they are discontinuing it this month, making us choose between ads, and lots of YouTube premium crap we don't want.

[–] JustSomePerson@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It is fucking disgusting to see your defense of racism.

ALL HUMANS HAVE THE RIGHT TO BE TREATED EQUALLY IN THE EYES OF THE LAW!

[–] JustSomePerson@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Everybody should have the same right to be heard. Different people having different rights to be heard, based on their race, is absolutely objectionable. And racist.

[–] JustSomePerson@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

That is entirely irrelevant. "The king exists, therefore the constitution should give different rights to regular people based on their race". Disgusting argument.

[–] JustSomePerson@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

Fuck, that's an awful take. All laws based on race or genetics are always a bad idea.

view more: ‹ prev next ›