Kayel

I separate work under capitalism from community directed, individually motivated, anarchially organised work. Hence the first edit.

Learning is a requirement of productivity, productivity cannot exist without learning, therefore learning is productive.

I don't think people have an issue with work, they have an issue with the current state.

Get ready for prohibition era gang warfare

See, I would classify learning for learning's sake to be productive.

And, yes, that's exactly what I was trying to say

That’s what’s so concerning about the case. The USA tried to persecute an Australian citizen working out of the EU for publishing information.

As he is not a US citizen he was not able to use the X amendment to free speech.

As a terrorist they could torture and kill him without covering anything up.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-10-01/julian-assange-supporters-write-to-pm-over-reported-cia-plot/100504522

He didn't leak, he published.

That's what's so concerning about the case. The USA tried to persecute an Australian citizen working out of the EU for publishing information.

If precedent was set they could kidnap anyone from sovereign countries based on US law

And even the things you have achieved are meaningless, people probably didn't like it, and you're still so bad at the NEW THING, why evén get öut ofbed

I appreciate your optimism and it's the correct approach. I think the consensus is it's optimistic.

I think medical advancement could be as dramatic this century was in the last. However, patent law is likely to hold us back

This comment seems contentious. Are the differences in opinion political? An ideological opposition?

• Taiwan, officially the Republic of China (ROC)
• China, the Peoples Republic of China (PRC)

.

Thank you for your comment, it provided more context than the article