Kepabar

joined 2 years ago
[–] Kepabar@startrek.website 4 points 1 year ago

... That is generally how it works where I live, yes.

Police causalities caused by actions intended to stop a felony are charged to the felon and they are held responsible.

Not that I fully agree with the unscrutinized part but your analogy isn't the best.

[–] Kepabar@startrek.website 40 points 1 year ago (3 children)

No.

It's cheaper to out source it this way because as their farmers are contractors they don't have to adhere to the legal responsibilities they would if they ran them in their own.

They can keep their contracted farmers in debt to them indefinitely and essentially have a class of indentured servants.

[–] Kepabar@startrek.website 20 points 1 year ago

It's Louisiana, they would go back to 1800 if they could.

[–] Kepabar@startrek.website 1 points 1 year ago

Don't tell this guy about how often Congress devolved into fist fights, cane beatings and duels during our countries early years.

[–] Kepabar@startrek.website 8 points 1 year ago

Nah, it was fine.

[–] Kepabar@startrek.website 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Same thing applies to humanitarian aid.

If Hamas has hijacked or is operating in those places then they become military targets.

As far as white phosphorus, it depends on how it's deployed. If it's deployed for masking, tracing or identifying then it's legal.

If it's being directly used as an incendiary then that's illegal.

[–] Kepabar@startrek.website 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

As far as international law goes no this is not a war crime.

If your military takes refuge or uses a civilian center for military operation then that location becomes a valid military target regardless of the risk to civilian lives.

Basically Hamas is commiting the crime by purposefully setting up in these areas. Once they do that then civilian death is acceptable collateral damage, legally speaking.

[–] Kepabar@startrek.website 2 points 1 year ago

I'm feeling pretty fatigued.

[–] Kepabar@startrek.website 1 points 1 year ago

Can't, really. Have several critical Windows only apps.

[–] Kepabar@startrek.website 1 points 1 year ago

It's a chicken and egg situation.

It's frustrating because I don't know it, and I don't learn it because it's frustrating.

[–] Kepabar@startrek.website 2 points 1 year ago

Generally deploying some kind of service.

[–] Kepabar@startrek.website 7 points 1 year ago (6 children)

It's things like this that prevent me from using Linux more.

I force myself to use it for projects where it's an option because I feel I need to learn it better but I kind of dread it every time.

Inevitably I'm stuck frustrated reading conflicting guides from years ago and wondering just how badly I'm going to fuck things up this time.

Sometimes it all feels so esoteric.

view more: ‹ prev next ›