[-] MaximumPower@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

Uh, what??? Care to explain or have some facts backup up your statement.

[-] MaximumPower@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Okej, I rebind certain keys, but sometimes it doesn't pick up the rebinds and actually registers them as the original krypresses, super annoying.

[-] MaximumPower@lemmy.world -5 points 11 months ago
[-] MaximumPower@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

If you think the baby sitter is abusing your kid, your a moron, why even hire him/her.

And now you are also recording the babysitter going to the bathroom.

[-] MaximumPower@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

Seems like a redhat problem, so why is he complaining. It wasn't the developer who signed an agreement to maintain xorg, so I don't get the argument. Either you do it for the money you get paid, and if you don't feel like it's enough, then don't do it. The developer can just quit and do something else, ask for another project. The only one who is making him work on xorg is redhat.

But why even mention m it in the same context as Wayland, make Wayland work for the end user and 90% of people would not care if thier Linux machine was using Wayland or xorg.

Yes I've had multiple issues with video conferencing on Wayland, but my experience is 1 - 2 years old. I just use what works, I don't have any technical problems with xorg and that is why I use it.

Just let xorg die.

[-] MaximumPower@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago

I honestly don't get these posts, there's a couple of things that is super weird.

  1. Why does every discussion about Wayland include trashing xorg?

  2. Isn't the solution pretty obvious, stop mainting xorg if you don't like to maintain xorg, who is forcing you to maintain xorg?

I really don't care if I'm using xorg or wayland, I just want something that works, and I have tried wayland and that isn't the case as of the moment. And I don't care about the why, because I can't be like yeah I use Wayland that's why I can't be on this video conference.

Just stop mainting it if you don't want to maintain it, problem solved, move on.

[-] MaximumPower@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I would disagree, most people want a more sustainable life, be it economical or ecological, people actually vote for that. But we are never given what we vote for, because of pressure on government given by the big corps, we're always given some half-assed version of what we actually want.

[-] MaximumPower@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Isn't it the GPU that drains the battery, why would a new CPU, help with that.

[-] MaximumPower@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

So cool that it matches the colors of sunrise/sundown.

[-] MaximumPower@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

You are just guessing. No, they manually update those, because you need the checksum.

A tip never use any tool that downloads something without checking a checksum, because you have no idea if the source you are downloading is still the same, it could be anything.

[-] MaximumPower@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah no, most build scripts if they are worth their salt, will absolutely not pull the latest package from a given source. Because that is insane, 99% of the time they validate the download with a checksum, meaning that you have to update the checksum in the build script, or in the case of multiple downloads - multiple checksums.

Yes pacman is the underlying technology that enables aur to exist.

view more: next ›

MaximumPower

joined 1 year ago