Meowoem

It's more a problem of all the human people want to live good lives, look at how many threads on the front page are talking about cost of living crisis and etc as serious social problems which need to be fixed - there's a thread where everyone says we should all be in walking distance to all key amenities, I bet they all think that the average persons wage should be able to afford to enjoy those things regularly too and have access to healthy fresh food, good clothes, etc etc

The world people want where everyone has access to a good life has never existed, even in America there is still generational and regional poverty but globally it's much more intense - it would be very unfair to say 'sorry we're not going to try and continue progress so you can live the same life I do, we're actually going back so you get less and work harder - it's not because further progress is impossible or anything but I personally don't really like new technology so, well, sucks to be you I guess.'

The technology which you're talking about carbon capture is an incredibly good technology and just because you don't understand it doesn't mean it shouldn't exist. It's not a magic wand of course but no one said it is, the uses with SAF and bioavailable carbon for example open up a lot of possibilities not just in rich nations but actually more so in developing nations allowing growth without oil infrastructure.

People have a real magical thinking about fifteen min cities and this is a good example of it, people don't just want to go to the nearest bar as if they're all interchangable they want to go to a bar that suits them with their friends who might well live more then fifteen min away

Were probably? That's a giant understatement and you know it.

Ai will save billions of lives and improve the living standard for everyone on the planet, it'll be just like mobile phones where the biggest benefits come to the poorest communities - tech haters often ignore this reality, millions of children in Africa, Asia, etc were only able to get access to education through mobile infrastructure.

The internet has given everyone access to huge amounts of education resources and it's only increased as they technology matures - current LLMs are amazing for language learners and for people who need things like English articles explained in their own language, I just asked chatgpt to explain the code I'm working on in Tagalog and it did it without hesitation (I can't speak for the accuracy personally but looks legit) it even translated variable names but not function calls.

And this before we've scratched the surface of it's utility, I'll tell you one thing if you ever say to your grandkids 'o I was against ai when it came out' they'll look at up like you'd look at someone who said they didn't think math would catch on or that iron would never be as popular as bronze.

Just a little technical note;

White phosphorus is not considered a chemical weapon because it operates primarily by heat and flame rather than toxicity, making it an incendiary weapon. Its use is governed by Protocol III of the Convention on Conventional Weapons (CCW)

Not saying that it can't be used in bad ways but it has legitimate uses in combat areas (mostly as a flair) so the issue of supply, etc is not as simple as were it an actual chemical weapon

Yeah I think that people should be a lot more willing to pay someone to contribute to open source than they are to pay for usage of closed code. It really should be seen as the best form of charity, like when I donate to an open source project that makes a good education tool what I'm really doing is donating that tool to every school in the developing world and every student that wouldn't have been able to afford a paid version.

I think that we need to get into a world where showing off which projects you support is a way of flexing, like all these super rich attention seekers need to start funding development teams for apps 'oh yeah I was so annoyed the librivox app didn't have ai search tools that I paid two PhD students to implement it, apparently it's been a real boon for foreign language learners and literary academics but I just use it to find me historic novels similar in theme to events in my own life, you know it suggested shadow over innsmouth, I don't know what it's trying to say!'

People need to see that it's much better to buy something for everyone in the world than just for you, especially because it makes it possible for other people like you to repay the favour and pay for further improvements which benefit you

Yeah the amount of good ai can do for the world is staggering, even just giving a speed boost and quality improvement to open source Devs will unlock a lot of new potential.

The problem is people in a certain age bracket often fear change because they feel they've put effort into learning how things work and if things change then all that effort will be worthless.

It doesn't really matter though, gangs of idiots literally smashed the prototype looms when they were demonstrated because despite the cost of cloth being one of the major factors in poverty at the time a handful of people took it on themselves to fight to maintain the status quo -- of course we know how it turned out, the same that it always does...

Areas that resisted technological and social growth stagnated and got displaced by those which welcomed it

What is happening?

Yeah it's frightening that there's literally a cult developing of home schooled zealots brought up on the wackiest conspiracies on YouTube. I was friends with a guy that was brought up by intese Jehovah's witnesses and even though he stopped participating and believing it took a long time for him to understand the stuff they'd taught him was crazy - like he was shocked that I believed in evolution because as far as he knew it was long since disproven.

The real problem was critical reasoning skills and learning skills, he had no idea how to verify information or seek out out from reasonable sources. I think we're going to get a lot of people in the same boat, except a lot more violent and terrified of the world.

Everyone says I'm dumb when I simp for a shitty corporation that exists on hype alone

It must be because I'm so superior to every tech community on the web and they're circlejetking

Lol

The problem is that's kinda true of pretty much everywhere so your choices are to isolate and only get lied to by your own politicians and corporate overlords or to accept the complexity of the world and try to work on moving forward where possible.

I do agree that this entirely greed based approach from the company is wrong but honestly I prefer it to your extreme xenophobia towards them. Yes there are issues with China just like all our countries have issues, they're not the devil though not by a long shot.

You're making up a lot of stuff, Xerox had a gui UI for a whole decade before apple and they certainly weren't the only ones.

The MP3 player they made was literally just a feature limited version of already popular devices. I got my arcos a year before the first apple device was released and it had every single feature that apple would slowly add in every new expensive version over the next decade

Apple does hype and marketing, that's their innovation - taking a feature restricted version of a technology and getting celebrities and media idiots to pretend it's the best thing in the world and actively ignore or discount the many better options.

It's a rare edge case that slipped through because the circumstances to cause it are obscure, from the description it was a minor bump and the software was updated to try and ensure it doesn't happen again - and it probably won't.

Testing for things like this is difficult but looking at the numbers from these projects testing is going incredibly well and we're likely to see moves towards legal acceptance soon