I beat Myst in 19 hours of continuous game play without a guide or the internet. Best? Well, if you intend to beat it, it’ll take a lot of thinking through stories.
MrEUser
You NO LONGER ARE ALLOWED ACCESS TO…. Well, honestly, I thought it was tough to vibe to as well. I like it, but I like Hellsinger MUCH more. Maybe someday there will be an interface that makes CotND that much more playable…
I’m offended because you’re offended.
I assume you’ve played Crypt of the NecroDancer (mentioning JUST IN CASE you missed it)…
Thank you for being the first person at sh.itjust.works that has upgraded their sense of humor routine enough to be compatible with this joke.
Have a wonderful day ;)
What you just said is the literal opposite of what the fediverse is. The fediverse is NOT social media.
Belief is the acceptance of a claim without evidence. There is evidence that Lemmy and Mastodon can, with time, replace their centralized counterparts.
So do I believe it? No. I know it can happen though. Will it happen? Definite maybe. First, all the users that are bunched up on three big servers need to learn the painful lesson of how a federated architecture works. It’s in their best interests to find small instances of lemmy and have accounts there. Why, because all the huge instances of lemmy are having trouble staying functional. Lemmy.world has 87,000 users and an uptime of 97%. That means it experiences 11 days of downtime a year. Almost a day per month. Sh.itjust.works has around 10,000 users and a 99% uptime by comparison (still 3 to 4 days a year of downtime). Many smaller instances have 100% uptime. Look for yourself.
Another thing future users (not users yet) need to stop using as an argument (excuse) is, “but if I have an account on a site and it disappears, I lose my account.” Well, first, that’s true of the centralized service you’re using. And don’t talk to me about “too big to fail…” arguments. If there’s one thing Twitter, Reddit, and YoutTube have proven, it’s that you are irrelevant and disposable. They may not vanish, but the long lasting stupid they do for the sake of… I don’t even know what… has led to multiple migrations to distributed environments.
Are distributed environments perfect? No. They ARE improving though. And the fact is, in a distributed environment when one instance enacts something that you don’t feel is in your best interest… You go to another instance. No drama, no fanfare… just move.
Your last sentence is the punchline of the joke I told… You can tell it’s comedy because the first sentence has an exaggeration so extreme it’s absurd (unless you REALLY think you can run Doom on an abacus). The second sentence references a meme used as comedy (but will it run Crysis). Then I set up the joke by showing how extreme the absurdity goes. How absurd you ask? Why, it’ll play Crysis, but not Doom…
Ha ha… funny…
I will never tell a joke on sh.itjust works again.
The shit just don’t work.
Wrong.
My first sentence includes a joke. “…Doom running on an abacus.” My second sentence includes a meme used as a joke, “…but does it run Crysis?” I have set the stage for what I wrote to be interpreted as humor, a joke, funny.
I then provide a comparison, it’ll run Crysis but not Doom (1993)… looks here’s the evidence.
Ha ha… funny.
Now, this conversation is over, you’r wrong, and you have proven you’re an ass.
We’re done here. Learn from your mistake.
Learn to read in context.
MY POST ALSO SAYS DOOM WILL RUN ON A DAMNED ABACUS!
Why didn’t you correct that? Because you were in such a damned hurry to be right, you didn’t stop to consider context. TWO jokes in a row didn’t give it away.
Learn to read in context.
Ooooh Ooooh, is it my turn to talk down to you now?
Having been in It for decades at this point, I probably have a pretty good grasp of what “supported” means there tiger. First, your inability to process humor… are you sure you’re not ChatGPT?
But more importantly, I have no doubt that Doom runs on a SteamDeck, let me clue you in….
Did you read the part where I claimed it ran on a damned abacus? Was that for REAL do you think? Probably not, huh?
If STEAM says it’s not supported, who do you think you need to convince sport?
Me or Steam?
Since you can’t figure it out on your own and are demanding to be right (without bing correct)… Let me spell it out so that it can’t be missed…
STEAM (not me) created a rating system. STEAM (not me) determined it is unsupported.
So the commentary is about Steams rating system. Why have one that doesn’t actually communicate the status of a games playability? Why have a status called “Playable” and not use it to communicate that yes in fact the game can be played on a SteamDeck.
I’m so looking forward to you explaining how right Steam and you are, I just can’t WAIT to see what you say next.
Having never played BPM, I have no way of knowing. If you click on the first picture in the article it’ll connect you to gameplay footage.