Nechesh

joined 1 year ago
[–] Nechesh@beehaw.org 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

For me the reason I like to use streaming services is as a way to find new music that I otherwise would never be exposed to.

[–] Nechesh@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago
[–] Nechesh@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

They may live mostly in trees but it's not uncommon for them to fly down into human reach.

[–] Nechesh@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Ya maybe new instance of defamation.

[–] Nechesh@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That was funny but ultimately probably irrelevant to the case except as it relates to giving a view into Lindell's insanity.

[–] Nechesh@beehaw.org 14 points 1 year ago

Yep, this is exactly the reaction of a cornered narcissist. The lawsuit, the deposition, the judge, the lawyer, they are all threatening the illusion that Mike is a great patriot CEO entrepreneur saving this country. The response is a deep, primal rage that he's only barely containing.

[–] Nechesh@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think most people understand it, but even referring to it as a type of "porn" normalizes it to some extent.

[–] Nechesh@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The politically correct term CSAM is to differentiate it from ordinary porn which is legal and at least somewhat socially acceptable and ensure that people understand that when children are involved, it is always abusive. The terms mean the same thing, but being precise with language is important.

[–] Nechesh@beehaw.org 23 points 1 year ago

Porn is a legal thing that normal people enjoy. The term CSAM takes a stance that it is always abuse. I think they are basically interchangeable but CSAM is the currently preferred term.

[–] Nechesh@beehaw.org 8 points 1 year ago (5 children)

What would you say is the difference? I feel like the terms are interchangeable. The comment you replied to didn't give the exact abbreviation but it gave the essence of what is meant by the picture.

[–] Nechesh@beehaw.org 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I thought Microsoft was the one requiring feature parity. It sounds like the real story is MS caving.

[–] Nechesh@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago

I'm sure it is traumatic but that denial doesn't relieve him of legal responsibility. Negligence that leads to death is often prosecuted criminally.

view more: next ›