[-] OnionQuest@lemmy.ml 29 points 1 year ago

Like any subject matter that is complex it requires someone to have specialized training to understand and navigate. We all have a working understanding of the legal system, but sometimes we need expert opinion. Few people are willing/able to master the subject matter so supply relative to demand is low.

The legal system is complex because our world is complex. We are constantly expanding human endeavors (Space law wasn't an issue until Sputnik) and changing current laws (Marijuana laws have changed in many states). It's not just a matter of learning the law once - it is constantly changing and requires an expert to be always up-to-date.

You're paying $.25 for the piece of paper and $199.75 for the lawyer's knowledge of how to file it.

[-] OnionQuest@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

I'm thinking it means workers of that time would not have that physique.

[-] OnionQuest@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

"Rather than teasing apart who, what, or when is to blame, this report shows that the post-9/11 wars are implicated in many kinds of deaths, making clear that the impacts of war's ongoing violence are so vast and complex that they are unquantifiable."

Did this writer or anyone in this thread actually read the paper?

[-] OnionQuest@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

I think there is going to be a greater push for KYC for social media as we are going to soon be inundated with comments and online activity by bots that is indistinguishable from humans and hyper taylored to its audience. All the stuff Russia pulled with election interference is going to be child's play.

There is also going to be an explosion of content. The same recipe page that took a human a day or two to create will be made in a second. Billions of recipe pages, billions of sports blogs, billions of comments...

[-] OnionQuest@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

Downfall of the West relative to who? The whole world is impacted by climate change and the West is best positioned to manage its effects.

[-] OnionQuest@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

It means it's not as simple as saying 1950 home = 2023 home and therefore any differences in price are due to inflation.

[-] OnionQuest@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

Honestly not really when compared to the alternative. Our net payout through alternatives was closer to 60%. We experienced a bot attack one month where we actually lost money due to generating massive transaction fees on bogus chargebacks.

I thought Google shifted to a flat 15% anyway (especially for small app developers). It's really a no brainer for app developers then.

[-] OnionQuest@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 year ago

My company tried transitioning app subscriptions to alternatives outside the app stores and it was not worth it. Credit card fraud was a massive issue. It got so bad the payment networks (Visa, MasterCard) threatened to ban us from their networks.

Google and Apple aren't totally rent seeking.

[-] OnionQuest@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

To be fair society benefited along with the companies. We should institute a carbon tax on all transactions - not just punish the energy companies.

Insurance rates should be higher in high risk areas. This is the most straight forward way to keep people from building in high risk areas. I really don't think we should subsidize Joe shmoe's insurance on the third rebuilding of his house.

[-] OnionQuest@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Who are the companies then reselling the houses to?

[-] OnionQuest@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

This is a bad take. Most Republicans are in 'safe' districts where their only challenge is from the right. Being pro-abortion is a surefire way to lose a Republican primary.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

OnionQuest

joined 1 year ago