[-] Patch@feddit.uk 1 points 2 weeks ago

Intel as a company isn't going anywhere any time soon; they're just too big, with too many resources, not to do at least OK.

They have serious challenges in their approach and performance to engineering, but short of merging with someone else they'll find their niche. For as long as x86-derived architectures remain current (i.e. if AMD is still chugging along with them) they'll continue to put out their own chips, and occasionally they'll manage to get an edge.

The real question would be what happens if x86 finally ceases to be viable. In theory there's nothing stopping Intel (or AMD) pivoting to ARM or RISC-V (or fucking POWER for that matter) if that's where the market goes. Losing the patent/licensing edge would sting, though.

[-] Patch@feddit.uk 4 points 2 weeks ago

Ha, my thoughts exactly. I've dipped out of Lemmy for a few weeks, just dipped back in today. "I wonder if it's still wall to wall Musk?" I thought, logging in; and this was the first post I see.

[-] Patch@feddit.uk 18 points 1 month ago

There's nothing truly like a Framework, because they're a whole unique category of one. But if you just want something that is user serviceable there are other options.

I'm a big fan of my Star Labs laptop. It came with complete disassembly and reassembly instructions, and pretty much every part is available to buy individually as a replacement. It's not magically "plug and go" like a Framework, but if you're comfortable with a screwdriver you should have no trouble.

They're a Linux specialist small independent producer, too. And being based in the UK, imports to Switzerland should be more straightforward than imports from the States.

[-] Patch@feddit.uk 1 points 3 months ago

The corollary of that line of thought though is that by preventing tech companies from dabbling in microprocessors you reduce competition in the microprocessor space- a sector which has proven very prone to the formation of monopolies/duopolies. If anything, we want to encourage more new competitors in that space, not fewer.

Also, it'd be essentially arbitrary. Is it OK for Apple to design its own microprocessors, but not Amazon- and if so, why? Is Google allowed if it uses them in phones like Apple, but not if it uses them in data centres like Amazon?

[-] Patch@feddit.uk 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

What with Trump recently declaring (in his usual completely coherent and not at all deranged manner) that Google Are Bad, the Supreme Court might not necessarily be feeling so keen to help out on this one.

[-] Patch@feddit.uk 1 points 3 months ago

The UK isn't quite that far, but it's absolutely the dominant text messaging and calling app in the UK. Nobody uses the built in Android or Apple tools anymore, and I'm as likely to receive a WhatsApp voice call as an actual phone call these days.

I have Signal on my phone, but I've literally never had a cause to use it; I've simply got no contacts on there.

[-] Patch@feddit.uk 8 points 3 months ago

One of these days someone should write a script that just automatically adds all the Amazon Prime games to your various Epic/GOG/etc. accounts.

I say "someone", because I'm far too lazy to do it.

But anyway, it would take a lot of work out of the job of mindlessly hoarding games I'll never get round to playing.

[-] Patch@feddit.uk 9 points 4 months ago

See, now I'm fine with that. I pay for Netflix and I want what I pay for to stay ad-free. Having an ad-supported tier with no fee in addition to that means that there are options for other people without enshittifying my experience.

That's a world of difference to what Amazon have done where they've shoved ads into the service that I thought I was paying for, and then offered to charge me even more to get my original ad-free service back.

[-] Patch@feddit.uk 16 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Something between trolling and a wish fulfillment fantasy from Farage here, but the fact that this sort of story isn't even absurd is a prety damning situation for the old Tories.

13
submitted 4 months ago by Patch@feddit.uk to c/uk_politics@feddit.uk
28
submitted 4 months ago by Patch@feddit.uk to c/uk_politics@feddit.uk
76
submitted 4 months ago by Patch@feddit.uk to c/uk_politics@feddit.uk
17
submitted 4 months ago by Patch@feddit.uk to c/uk_politics@feddit.uk
[-] Patch@feddit.uk 8 points 4 months ago

Most local parties have something in the region of 500 members, the vast majority of whom aren't active canvassers. Losing 48 door knockers would suck, but I'd bet good money that all 48 weren't door knockers.

Losing 48 passive members would be nothing; membership fluctuates by almost that margin for mundane reasons over the course of a few months anyway.

[-] Patch@feddit.uk 1 points 5 months ago

That'd be a turn up for the books; usually it's the student who gets shafted by the Tories, not the other way around.

[-] Patch@feddit.uk 11 points 5 months ago

This feels like something you should go tell Google about rather than the rest of us. They're the ones who have embedded LLM-generated answers to random search queries.

30
submitted 5 months ago by Patch@feddit.uk to c/uk_politics@feddit.uk

The more people find out about the Green party’s policies, the more they tend to switch off. So today’s campaign launch was over in 15 minutes

18
submitted 5 months ago by Patch@feddit.uk to c/uk_politics@feddit.uk
99
submitted 5 months ago by Patch@feddit.uk to c/uk_politics@feddit.uk
20
submitted 6 months ago by Patch@feddit.uk to c/uk_politics@feddit.uk
64
submitted 6 months ago by Patch@feddit.uk to c/uk_politics@feddit.uk
26
submitted 8 months ago by Patch@feddit.uk to c/uk_politics@feddit.uk
54
submitted 9 months ago by Patch@feddit.uk to c/uk_politics@feddit.uk
30
submitted 9 months ago by Patch@feddit.uk to c/uk_politics@feddit.uk
view more: next ›

Patch

joined 1 year ago