RosethornRanger

joined 2 months ago
[–] RosethornRanger@hexbear.net 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

but that's the thing, the only way you can "fight AI" is by hurting real people and I won't be a willing sacrifice

[–] RosethornRanger@hexbear.net 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

ew yourself, I like it

[–] RosethornRanger@hexbear.net 18 points 2 months ago

yeah ive had similar experiences, but now with so many spaces threatening to ban "AI" I feel like my access to the internet is going to be massively restricted

 

alt-text for thumbnail in case it embeds: it is an image of a queer flag with an infinity symbol, on a drawn wooden background with the words “autistic people mistaken for AI” on it

[–] RosethornRanger@hexbear.net 2 points 2 months ago

and sorry about the audio quality, I actually just got a better setup for that uwu

 

alt-text for thumbnail since it embeds: it is an image of the autistic flag with an infinity symbol and multiple colored bars (i have a hard time telling them apart), on a drawn wooden background with the words "aspergers is abeist" on it

[–] RosethornRanger@hexbear.net 6 points 2 months ago

yes, which is why I am advocating for systems that can be flexible and do not require everyone to do there for things to happen

[–] RosethornRanger@hexbear.net 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

things can be done with a smaller group of people that aren't a punishment for the person arriving late, I do not mean to say nothing should happen. What I'm saying is if something rigidly requires the participation of everyone it should be reworked so that it does not.

I am in the same boat with public transportation, and what I do is things with a smaller group that the people arriving wouldn't want to participate in in the first place. Punishing people for arriving early is just as harmful as punishing people for arriving late, I did not mention it because I do not see people advocate for that specifically.

waiting for people definitely does suck, and I know the feeling about being the one always compromising.

 

Timing the start of something is not a simple process. Punishing people for being late disproportionately impacts poor and disabled people. Not all of us can drive a car or even have a car to drive. We might have to wait on other people, or use public transportation, and the more steps we add to the process the more likely something is to go wrong. Punishing people for being late is systematic oppression towards these groups. This punishment can include starting without people, especially if that itself is framed as a punishment.

“Let the late ones be late and miss out (they can read the minutes), and reward the prompt ones by not wasting their time”

From the rusty's rules of order, something the IWW uses to organize. They are ableist.

On the other hand, waiting too long to start can impact people with limited time or energy. Not everyone can stay awake an extra hour just to wait for something to start.

This means that there is not one singular solution for how to start things (although obviously don’t do punishment). In small groups the best solution is to talk things over with everyone and get an idea for what everyone wants to happen, what can go wrong, and plans to mitigate any potential issues. If public transportation is running late, maybe someone with a car can go pick you up.

For large groups, most things do not need a strict starting time. If it is a large group and it requires strict attendance then you brought hierarchy into it long ago and ableism and such was always the conclusion you were going to get anyways.

[–] RosethornRanger@hexbear.net 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

yeah I'm getting a lot of hate for using this one, doesn't matter if its used as a slur by some we are using it in a positive way to reference our community and ourselves, it is textbook reclamation. I'm blocking a lot of people in the thread lol

literally every word for ourselves is used as a slur by fascists smh

[–] RosethornRanger@hexbear.net 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I have seen people in the comments on some platforms argue for that when I mention stuff like this, its a time

[–] RosethornRanger@hexbear.net 20 points 2 months ago

I don't think slower is the right way to put it, they often end up on the front lines of building oppressive structures themselves

[–] RosethornRanger@hexbear.net 17 points 2 months ago (2 children)

yeah I've had similar experiences as well, it has lead to me having little trust in teachers in general

 

I don't like being referred to as a "person with autism". I can't just set it down, it's not something I can remove. It is fundamental to the way I interact with the world, right down to how stim enters my brain. If my brain has types of inputs no allistic person can even approach, and methods of processing inherently different, it is an existence no allistic person can reach. There is no version of me that is not autistic.

A "cure" is the same as shooting me and replacing me with someone else.

The type of person I am is autistic. I am autistic.

I know it is a big trend in leftist spaces to use person first language, but in many situations that just sounds like eugenics to me. Personhood is not some distinct universal experience. There is no “ideal human mind” floating out there in the aether for them to recognize in me.

I get that person first language helps some people recognize that thoughts happen behind my eyes, but if the only way they can do that is by imagining I’m them, I don’t care.