SheeEttin

The general public doesn't have a caffeine sensitivity, so no, it's not lethal to the general public.

I don't think people should have to put extra filters to get what they signed up for when they subscribed to "technology"

I just checked the front page of this community (as sorted by active) and none of those posts were about protocols, so...

it's called magnuson-moss, it already exists

https://www.capitalone.com/cars/learn/managing-your-money-wisely/what-is-the-magnusonmoss-warranty-act-for-cars/1578

You'd get people voting for all the projects and none of the budget.

It's any notification not generated locally. Your phone maintains a persistent, continuous connection to the notification service, which is provided by Google or Apple. When there's a notification, they push it down the pipe to your device.

This is opposed to regular "pull", where the device opens a new connection every so often to poll the server and ask "hey you got any new messages for me?"

There's really no easy way to tell whether a notification is pushed or pulled. Even if you turn off notifications entirely, the connection is probably still present so that your app still receives data about new email, your turn to play, etc.

(And on the other hand, promotional notifications, like ones that remind you to play a game, or order something on Doordash, are probably on a recurring local timer, not pushed down ad-hoc each time.)

Can we expand this to multi-family houses? I don't think we need it for apartment buildings too, but triple-deckers, for example, are not that different.

This is a civil case, which has a lower standard of proof.

Fear or shame, probably.

Ironic, even.

I can't find an article, but I heard a report of male hostages being sexually assaulted this morning on my local NPR member station.

Anyway, free Palestine.