ShittyKopper

joined 1 year ago
[–] ShittyKopper@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 7 months ago

epic megapost

[–] ShittyKopper@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 7 months ago

nah, there are plenty of truth wannabes (freeze peach bigotry safe havens) that actively federate. just look at literally any competent server's blocked instances list and you'll see a few examples. there's a reason why nobody* runs completely open federation

*: aside from people who're friendly with that crowd ofc

[–] ShittyKopper@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

(vanilla) mastodon does not have markdown, and content from other instances (marked up or not) get transmitted as HTML over the wire (and the mastodon API serves sanitized HTML to apps).

mastodon forks like glitch, and clones of the mastodon API like those on pleroma/akkoma and iceshrimp do serve the markdown source AFAIK, but unless OP's looking to... idk, support MFM (which, on a non-web app would be difficult) I don't really see the point in that.

[–] ShittyKopper@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 7 months ago

OP edited them out after posting for whatever reason

[–] ShittyKopper@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 7 months ago (4 children)

i cant help but not to when the entire internet has nothing but amerlcan politics

i dont even live in america

[–] ShittyKopper@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

mastodon doesn’t “discover” akkoma content and won’t show anything unless you’re following a user from there, which kinda sucks.

I mean -- that's how all of them work. Even Lemmy. Unless your instance administrator joins relays (which have tradeoffs between privacy / effectiveness of blocking) your instance is only ever aware of posts from followed people (and reply threads followed people are involved in)

(also MUCH lighter on server resources, compared to most other twitter-like alternatives)

Mastodon is just unusually heavy, really. Even Misskey & forks are lighter than Masto on the server side (preferring being bloated on the client instead)

[–] ShittyKopper@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Mastodon feels like a fucking funeral.

You're clearly nowhere near the good parts, then.

In my experience, once when you find your way into the correct circles the microblog-verse makes the "shitposting" of Lemmy look like r/memes. I do agree that discoverability could be better though, it took me 4-5 months before I got the hang of it. And now I barely check Lemmy despite my Lemmy account being older than my earliest microblog account (under this name, anyway).

One important thing is that your instance matters quite a bit more than here. Starting on a large general purpose instance (especially if it's mastodon.social) and just following Large Accounts and Nobody Else like most people recommend for some reason is just setting yourself up for disappointment. Instead, get on a smaller interest-specific instance (rule of thumb: the weirder the domain the better your experience will be!) and follow the local timeline (and on good software, the bubble/recommended timelines). And post stuff/interact with people. Don't be that one person that does nothing but boost news bots and occasionally butt into replies of people asking rhetorical questions they already know the answer for.

(Perhaps Lemmy is better at news or whatever, I wouldn't know as I block all news communities I can find -- I just don't see the point as all the discussion around most news ends up predictable, unproductive (not that internet communities necessarily need to be "productive"), and unnecessarily angry)

Also in a world with usable™ Misskey forks and Akkoma I think the limitations of Mastodon the software are really starting to show, and I urge anyone who's been disappointed in Mastodon to try other microblog software. (Quotes are already a thing if you know where to look! So are emoji reactions, because people have more emotions than :star:)

[–] ShittyKopper@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

What I'm more worried about are posts relating to news mainly. Where even if the immediate first level comments are fine, there are threads that get out of hand really quickly.

I agree that while posts inherently designed to be controversial may not benefit from Active considering the influences voting has (though me being on an instance that has downvotes disabled may be influencing my view here!), Active may make it significantly easier for an otherwise innocent post to devolve into a flame war.

The main excuse for this kind of algorithm seems to be around "promoting discussion", but in my experience tech that's intended to promote discussion does inherently promote flame wars too, as they're extremely difficult if not impossible to distinguish without a human in the loop. I've attempted to write something about this on the microblogging side of the fedi, directly influenced by this post

[–] ShittyKopper@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I'm just throwing this out there but having the default sort incentivize comments seems like it'd highlight posts meant to cause flame wars... Is that what we want out of this platform?

[–] ShittyKopper@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

the domain was set to expire in April and was intentionally not being renewed because gestures vaguely at everything

people knew this was coming at some point. the surprising part was that it happened now from the orders of the registry as opposed to in April.

announcements were made and the instance was already in it's death bed for a while, this isn't like the fmhy/mali situation with things happening out of the blue.

view more: ‹ prev next ›