I follow the same philosophy. Avoiding spoilers, there was a part of Act 2 that I thought was just the next conversation in a series of conversations, but it triggered a significant event that blocked me out of several things I had on the to-do list. I had no idea it'd trigger that, and imo I don't think it's reasonable that it would happen, so I did scum that.

Never understood the hurry of the crack groups.

You serious?

Obviously the sooner they crack it the sooner they can sell to impatient pirates. The market is only going to decrease over time, and if you're beaten to the punch you lose out on loads of customers.

When the Dwarves and Humans first interacted they both described it as "we just smash", and much sitcom hilarity came out of a simple misunderstanding that nobody bothered to clarify.

The syntax strikes me as a little clunky, but I do like the idea. Coming from Python I've used generators a lot (which in my obviously biased opinion is a clearer name that "iterator" here) so recognise the value in having something like that in the language.

Same. Whenever I see messages like his it just smacks of denial / coping strategies. "It's all those promiscuous women's fault I can't get a girlfriend" fuckin grow up.

"Get your evidence away from my beliefs"

This is just provably untrue. You might have more relationship-weighted encounters off-app, but to say that it's unhelpful if you don't want a relationship is false.

Not sure if you know this but on the off chance, that's a deliberate choice by the devs, so it really won't ever be on sale.

I used to know a guy who worked oil rigs I think six months of the year, earned a ton, then spent his off six months playing EVE Constantly. I think that might be close to the optimal way to play tbh.

You just unlocked that exact same memory, holding the right stick "just so" to make the camera usable. I seem to remember needing to lead turns in the same way too.

Same feelings / background here. Navigation will take me a little to grok, but I'm liking it so far.