TaTTe

Why not just add speed limits to areas where higher speeds are an issue? That's been the approach to cars -- no car is limited to 140 kmh despite speeds above that are illegal pretty much everywhere...

Regular bikes can easily go above 15 mph as well, so why should this only affect e-bikes?

Sounds a lot like me. Especially when I was a child, I was extremely underweight because of this. I rarely had any appetite to eat, and when I did, I got full after just a few bites. Talked to several therapists, no one was able to diagnose me.

Nowadays it's better. I eat as much and as often as possible, to the point of almost feeling sick, and I'm barely able to keep a healthy weight. Sometimes I wish I had problems with being overweight instead, since that's at least 10x easier to combat. Although, I bet life is easier being underweight than being overweight, as I've always been decently athletic with barely any training.

Yes they do. This is a deterrent, not a last-ditch effort to protect ourselves if war breaks out.

Herb is ört in Swedish. Gräs is better translated as grass, so ogräs is non-grass. This also enables a funny way to insult someone's lawn -- since lawn is gräsmatta (grass carpet) -- by calling it an ogräsmatta.

I don't think they literally meant journeys from one end of the country to the other, but rather travelling distances of 100-500 km. Maybe even up to 1000 km would be preferable by rail, especially with night trains.

I do agree that if you for some reason specifically want to travel from Orlando to Detroit, plane is by far the superior option. But Orlando to Miami? Or Orlando to Atlanta? High speed rail would be perfect.

Yup, that's even easier to implement and could be done in any city within a few years. I just can't fathom why almost every single street in almost every single city MUST support through traffic. Even in cities with great public transport and great infra for walking/cycling, with only a fraction of the citizens driving cars, somehow cars are still allowed to drive through basically everywhere. Looking at you Helsinki...

Also, the size of the city is irrelevant. Even in the video, NJB describes how this concept could be implemented in any city. You don't encircle the whole city with a ring road, but you create these rings with a diameter of ~2 km around train/metro stations. Even Houten consists of two such rings nowadays. Larger cities would be dozens, if not hundreds, of rings.

I kid you not, this is called förgätmigej (förgät mig ej) in Swedish. I was today years old when I found out "förgät" actually is an old word meaning, you guessed it, "forget".

(The common translation for "forget" would be "glöm".)

Also, there are some plans to connect this bridge to the land barely visible on the right edge of the picture. Not sure if that also plays into the curvature, or when this bridge connection will actually be built.

Do you mean like this?

https://images.app.goo.gl/1iUCRCcFd7XAUxBc6

It's basically in every kitchen in Finland, and has spread somewhat to the other Nordic countries, but is apparently rare elsewhere.

The Parliament would decide to ratify Ukraine's accession to the EU, but the official papers are signed by the president, so he could use his veto to block it.

The decision goes back to the Parliament, and if it passes with a 2/3 majority the president is forced to sign no matter what he thinks.

Again, I'm not 100% sure it works like this in Poland, but it does in several countries.

As I understand, the president can still use his veto, forcing the question back to the parliament requiring 2/3 majority to overrule the veto.