Thank you for this!
UniversalMonk
I'm against because I think it's just censorship. Funny how when it was twitter, no one had problems. But Musk bought it and now it's a problem.
My experience is that there is no fucking difference between how it was and how it is now. Lemmy just hates Musk.
Having said that, I'm not really passionate about it either way. And as long as screen shots can still be shown, I'm cool.
But guys, you're not even making a dent in Musk's money hoard by avoiding linking to it. lmao
And hey, it's this instance. And it was voted on, so I can totally accept it. I'd much rather it be a vote than some power-hungry guy just making the decision. :)
I come from a socialist-skewed background, so I'm dipping my toes in these waters as I'm leaning into Anarchism. And this community is awesome for me so far. :)
Great read on this. Thanks for posting!
You can remove .midwest.social. They banned me because they said I'm a conservative and they don't allow conservatives. I'm actually a vegan libertarian anarchist socialist, but meh...
And did ya notice that I use the same username on every one. So it'd be pretty hard to ban evade since I'm using the same freakin' name. See my point?
A ban evader is someone who creates alternate accounts to sneak back into communities or instances they've been banned from, just to continue posting.
I don’t do that.
I’ve kept the same username across different instances, and I avoid posting in communities where I’ve been banned. I do this for transparency—so everyone knows I’m not posting in places that I’m banned from.
And yes, I’m aware of that thread. In fact, I use a screenshot of it as my profile banner. Notice that the new instance admins didn’t ban me because they saw that I wasn’t ban evading.
For example: If you banned me from this community, I wouldn’t post here again, no matter what instance I’m using. I’m not a ban evader.
Moving to a different instance after being banned, and avoiding the banned instance, is NOT ban evading.
Lemmy values diversity of thought, and the whole point of the Fediverse is that there’s no central authority that can just get rid of everyone they don't like.
Different admins and different instances have different preferences and crowds. That's what's so awsome about the Fediverse and Lemmy!
Thanks!
You sent that five different times to the same person, copy-pasting it, after a long and similarly emotional argument with them.
And I don't think that was unhinged. If someone keeps the argument going, I keep the replies going.
But it also shouldn’t be my job to find every one of your dozen plus accounts that keep popping up
And it's not. Feel free not to worry about every account I make.
I didn’t say I thought you had an ulterior motive
Fair enough. I was curious and was probably reading too much into your anger.
I don’t know if pasting sections from the horror fiction counts, since it’s “supposed to be horror,” but that was a lot more unhinged.
Again, not unhinged. Those stories are direct parodies of the absurdity of Lemmy and how passionate people are.
Even the name of the series is "Tales from the Cryptic Lemmy." Get it? Tales from the Crypt. The 1960's outrageous comic and the cheesy 1980's tv show. And I still write them and just added a story and am finishing up editing one now.
In fact, they stories are still up: https://sh.itjust.works/c/talesfromthecrypticlemmy
And I have never written any stories about any specific person on Lemmy. Inspired by the outrageous things said to me, yes, but that's what creativity is. Just like singers write songs about shit people throw at them in real life, and turn it into an awesome tune. (Hi, Taylor Swift--I'm a Swiftie. :))
Also, let's not forget that you said you didn't even read them. So are ya saying that you have read them now?
Come on, fess up... it's ok, we're friends now. Ya finally reading my stuff? :)
By the way, my most recent story plays on the undercurrent of how some want Lemmy to just stay one way, an echo chamber. Kind of like, you know, a lack of color. It's a fun pulpy horror story that I'm sure you will find some way to twist into me being unhinged:
The Lady of Endless White - https://sh.itjust.works/post/30746811
"Dr. Caldwell answers a call for help at a strange, colorless mansion, but what he uncovers is anything but pure. In the Lady of Endless White, shadows linger even in the brightest of places!”
See the pulpy cheese of that? Picture the crypt keeper saying it. Kinda one of my best stories to be honest. :)
Dude, it's Lemmy, don't take it all so seriously.
And I'm actually writing another Crypic Lemmy story as we speak, so look for that tomorrow.
Thanks, friend!
Because you got banned on the first one.
Yeah, I have never denied that. I was banned on one instance so I branched out to different instances. I decentralized, which lines up with the entire spirit of the Fediverse.
Getting banned, and then making a bunch of accounts on new instances saying “Despite the attempts to silence me, I’m still here” is evading the ban.
I disagree. Evading a ban is coming up with a DIFFERENT user name, then going into places I was banned from and continuing to post. I have never posted on .world since the ban (other than to respond to the thread you participated in and I worked with .world admin on that and made them and my admin aware of it).
By me keeping the same username across instances, I'm being transparent. It would be very easy to just pick a new name, and go back on .world and post. That would be ban evading, which I don't do.
Me posting on another instance isn't a ban evade by any definition. Admins agree.
I quoted mod logs of you violating the rules with incredible aggressiveness, pissing off almost everyone, and posting unhinged messages to people.
Nope. You have pissed people off, does that make you a troll? I never posted any unhinged messages. Please quote one in this thread. I wanna see. I haven't changed what or how I post/reply at all. I stand by what I say and believe in.
still posting ragebait like “transracial” and content from Fox News and Breitbart
"Ragebait" is posting something to piss people off on purpose. I don't do that. I post whatever I find interesting, regardless of source, and I follow rules of the communities. And when I don't, they remove.
I recently had a community say my source wasn't good enough and gave me a list of sources that they thought were acceptable. So now I only post from those sources.
Not everyone hates Fox News and Brietbart. You do, and that's perfectly fine. If you modded a community, I wouldn't post from those sources. But those sources are not outlawed in the US or the earth or Lemmy. Even if you wish they were.
I'm not sorry that I don't hate Trump as much as Lemmy does. But apparently a huge chunk of the US doesn't either, since he won popular vote.
But I still didn't vote for him nor do I think he will be a good president. And I don't think that just because I post a news article that is favorable to him makes me a "nazi."
A lot of your postings and the sheer magnitude of them sound sincerely unhinged,
Please provide a sample of what you think was unhinged. I'm not being a dick, I honestly want to see what you think is unhinged. I stand by everything I said. And in fact, send people links to my previous conversations when I don't want to repeat the same thing.
came back with a friendlier approach
I haven't changed my tone at all, nor do/did I see a reason to.
because that’s trolling.
Trolling is saying things just TO piss people off, not saying things that happen to piss people off.
But, you’re the one who chose to come in and reply to my comment, when I’d taken steps to block you,
It's not my job to find out if someone has blocked me or not. I didn't even know you blocked me until you mentioned it at the start of this conversation by saying the variation of "in spite of my attempts to block you.."
Not only that, I was agreeing with your comment when I replied.
It seems to me now matter how or what I reply, you are determined to think I have some ulterior motive here. I'd really like you to just say what that is.
Don't be vague, and say "you like to annoy people." I feel that under the surface, you actually think my MO is something specific and sinister. If you feel that would break this subs rules, feel free to DM me.
But I am really, honestly curious what you think my goal is. People mentioned before that by me saying I supported third-party, it was to "throw the election." Tho even if every single person that voted third-party would have voted for Harris, she still would have lost since the margin was so big.
And now plenty of people talk about voting or creating a third party. lol
I'm very curious of what you think my motive is. Or maybe it is just that you think I'm here to annoy. Or maybe you won't answer because you've blocked me.
To your point, this is probably off-topic for this community anyway.
Either way, best of luck to ya, mate!
It's just Lemmy, man... :)
I wasn't even aware of paysafecard. Wow. Thanks for this info!