V1K1N6

joined 11 months ago
[–] V1K1N6@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

It's a sidegrade imo, since you can now use it on non-battle tactic strats if you want

[–] V1K1N6@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

I sure as hell didn't vote for him, but unfortunately a lot of the people in this country have become victims of his populism. Now while at first I was hoping his coalition would fall ASAP, polls have indicated that he's only gathered more support during the time it took him to form it. That means there's a non-zero chance that if we have re-elections sooner rather than later, he could get enough votes to rule without other parties. We just have to endure it for a bit until he inevitably fails and loses the voters' trust like Rutte before him.

[–] V1K1N6@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The right doesn't give a rat's ass about class struggles, only about raising profits

[–] V1K1N6@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Pansexuality baby! Congrats on your self-discovery!

[–] V1K1N6@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago (21 children)

I've seen and heard your argument made before, not just for LLM's but also for text-to-image programs. My counterpoint is that humans learn in a very similar way to these programs, by taking stuff we've seen/read and developing a certain style inspired by those things. They also don't just recite texts from memory, instead creating new ones based on probabilities of certain words and phrases occuring in the parts of their training data related to the prompt. In a way too simplified but accurate enough comparison, saying these programs violate copyright law is like saying every cosmic horror writer is plagiarising Lovecraft, or that every surrealist painter is copying Dali.

[–] V1K1N6@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago