ValueSubtracted

In the Mike McMahan interview TrekMovie ran yesterday, he said they knew it was going to be the final season fairly early in the writing process, so you could be on to something.

But also the way the show ends, while it does feel final, it also blooms into all these other opportunities that we could either make shows, or we could do comics or write books, or fans could just very fully imagine that these characters are still doing awesome Star Trek stuff, and it’s different. We end with them in a different place, but there’s no betrayals. Nobody’s gonna feel like we pulled the rug out from under them.

They're still going to kill Trip Tucker though, right?

"Prodigy" has demonstrated that they're willing to cancel something they gave an early renewal to.

I'm wondering if he'll be playing Roger Korby. During the panel, they said that they wouldn't confirm or deny certain rumours that have apparently been floating around.

Edit: I forgot they already cast him.

Between her, Holly Hunter, and Paul Giammatti, this is a pretty stacked cast (even though they're not all series regulars).

Yeah, this one has always been slated as a Paramount+ exclusive.

You know, modern medicine has made great strides when it comes to issues like this.

Despite the series' popularity with...people like us, I don't think the numbers were where Paramount+ wanted them. It seems like they have issues with animation in general, which is a damn shame.

Choices were made.

"Explorers" doesn't contain a single reference to Sisko using a replicator during construction, but he does say, "I want to use the same types of tools the Bajorans had." He asks O'Brien for a saw, and there are several scenes in which he's seen welding pieces together.

It gets converted into another form, as in the operation of any machine. I'm not arguing that it's destroyed.