Zamboniman

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] Zamboniman@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh, there was nothing wrong with the gist of what they said, it was the personal commentary at the beginning that was unneeded. If they had skipped that then their point would have been likely considered more thoughtfully by those reading.

[–] Zamboniman@lemmy.ca 262 points 1 year ago (7 children)

...Kernel patch at age 4. Sigh... What have I done with my life?

[–] Zamboniman@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

No, ignorant takes like yours are the real problem.

Is this Reddit?! (Looks up at title bar in confusion.)

No.....well, this is odd.

[–] Zamboniman@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Yes. Even when I know what the limits are, and why, the thing lulls you into responding as if it were a conscious agent. The downside of the way it produces speech.

[–] Zamboniman@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

Yup, exactly what I experienced too.

44
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Zamboniman@lemmy.ca to c/chatgpt@lemmy.world
 

As a brand new user of ChatGPT, I have never been so incredibly impressed and rage-inducing frustrated at exactly the same time with any new tech I've ever tried.

I was using it to help create some simple javascript functions and debug some code. It could come up with working functions almost immediately that took a really interesting approach that I wouldn't have thought of. "Boom," I thought, "this is great! Let's keep going!" Then, immediately afterwards, it would provide absolute shit that couldn't and wouldn't work at all. It couldn't remember the very code it just outputted to me on multiple occasions, and when asked to make a few minor changes it constantly spouted brand new very different functions, usually omitting half the functionality it had before. But, when the code was directly typed in by me in a message, every time, it did much better.

Seems with every question like that I had to start from scratch every time, or else it would work from clearly wrong (not even close, usually) newly generated, code. For example, if I asked it to print exactly the same function it printed a moment ago, it would excitedly proclaim, "Of course! Here's the exact same function!" and then print a completely different function.

I spent so much time carefully wording my question to get it to correctly help me debug something that I ended up finding the bug myself, just because I was being so careful in examining my code so I could ask it a question that would give me a relevant answer. So....I guess that's a win? Lol. Then, just for fun, I told ChatGPT that I had found and corrected the bug, and it took responsibility for the fix.

And yet, when it does get it right, it's really quite impressive.

[–] Zamboniman@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 year ago

I just watched 12 Angry Men (1957) for the first time and it is incredible.

Absolutely. It's a timeless masterpiece in my opinion.

[–] Zamboniman@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Thanks, I'll take a look and give this a try.

Edit: Looks like the subscribed communities dropdown has been added to the latest version of mlmym so perhaps I won't need it on the old.lemmy.* sites

[–] Zamboniman@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Awesome, thanks for the update and new features!

Would it be possible to make the script work with old.lemmy.ca (and old.lemmy.world, etc) as well? The lack of access to subscribed communities on the old.* frontend, despite its advantages, makes it borderline unusable.

[–] Zamboniman@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

Your account is only your account on one instance. You can have other accounts on other instances. However, you can access and post to all of the communities, content, and posts on all federated instances from your one account on one instance.

[–] Zamboniman@lemmy.ca 58 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

So far I have to create a new username/password on each instance and subscribe to all the things I want to on that new account.

Why are you needing to do that? You only need one account on one instance and you can subscribe to all the things you want on every instance (assuming that it hasn't been defederated for some reason). That way you'll only have one account with one list of subscribed communities instead of differing ones on different accounts.

 

I've seen this done in almost every combination imaginable, and would like to know what the 'correct' way to do this is. I've seen the building marked as 'retail' with a point at the pumps for 'gas station' and a point in the building for 'convenience store', I've seen the building itself marked as one with a point added for the other, I've seen the pumps area marked as the gas station and the building marked as the convenience store, and on and on.

What's the recommended way to do this?

 

I accidentally banned someone and now can't figure out how to unban them.

 

I came across this one on userstyles.world and didn't see it referenced here. It's probably the most 'old reddit' looking of all of the one's I've seen so far.

 

cross-posted from: https://beehaw.org/post/563759

Have fun!

 

Yup, it still works. The hose was replaced long ago, so that's not original. I have a really nice cordless Dyson that I use for day to day vacuuming, but this one lives downstairs and still does the job when its asked of it.

 

Upon joining Lemmy I noticed there was no similar community here yet, so I created one.

A place to discuss and show off your vintage and retro technology. Avoid discussion of retro personal computers here but almost any other retro and old technology photos, videos, and discussion is welcome and encouraged.

view more: next ›