[-] Zaroni@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago

This is not just open carry, it's carry of all firearms outside of ranges.

[-] Zaroni@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

"Election push" lmao, have to make it look like they are trying a little even though everyone knows there is no such thing

[-] Zaroni@sh.itjust.works -4 points 1 year ago

Compared to Russian sources radio free liberty is a baron of truth and press accountability, so frankly it does not matter.

[-] Zaroni@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago

Good to know the Russian NCO is not just dogshit in the army lmao. Conscriptovich is going to need an extra large push broom for those

[-] Zaroni@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

Uh, yes they would? Have you heard of: the soviet union, the ccp or ww2 Germany? All had different rebellions, but all failed because they did not have any firepower. One of the very first things the fascist government of Germany did was remove weapons from anyone that was an enemy of the state. Now in present day ukraine, because none of the citizens were permitted to own arms, Ukrainians have no way to fight an insurgent war on Russian occupiers. Without any means to violently resist a fascist takeover, the people are at the mercy of the government. I love how so many people post about how "if enough trans or nby people arms themselves then the government will enact gun control" and completely miss the irony of that point completely proving correct the points people make against gun control.

[-] Zaroni@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

OK, I don't think I have heard people arguing about vietnam, but Afghanistan was retaken in days by an armed rebellion, and they only ever shot down 38 aircraft, and did not down a single fast mover during the entire war. And even so, a countries government can't survive by bombing its infrastructure against a sustained rebellion. If the majority of America decided to rebel against the us government, they would be completely screwed.

Zaroni

joined 1 year ago