Short answer, probably not. Anatomy is complex, and the source of the pressure may or may not be at the single point where you most feel it. Even if it is a single point, you wouldn't be dealing with what caused the pressure, and the body would seal the wound as quickly as it can.

An Oculus Quest 2 headset with controllers.

Still overpriced for that game.

As if you're perceptive enough to know whether or not you're a failure at being a functional human being.

Maybe if you tried harder.

Edit: apparently it wasn't clear enough that I'm not serious

...I'm not sure how else you're trying to be seen, based on how you keep responding to me.

I'm not talking about how it was seen. I'm talking about how it is. There's a difference.

Cutting off hands was seen as socially acceptable at certain times in history, if someone was merely accused of theft. But it is horrific and terrible. How it was seen as irrelevant to it being terrible objectively terrible.

Are you just trolling, or are you actually trying to defend some of that behavior?

No, but it was harmful.

I'm talking about the objective harm of encouraging underage girls to avoid study and live their lives in the service of older men. There is nothing good that can be said about such a thing. It's basically indentured servitude.

I said it was objectively terrible, I didn't mention morals. :)

Harming people is terrible, whether or not social morality supports it.

It's not possible for one person to know every browser in existence, and on what platforms they're available.

Mobile wasn't specified :)

As disgusting as we see it now, keep in mind that, back then, child marriage was not only condoned but sometimes encouraged in those parts of the Southern U.S.

We'll never know if he did it because he had a thing for young girls, or if he did it simply because it was an accepted practice.

Regardless of why, it's objectively terrible that he did that.