bananabenana

joined 1 year ago
[–] bananabenana@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Everyone is always talking about spider silk as ropes. What about DNA huh? Mass strawberry extraction for a DNA space elevator when?

[–] bananabenana@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Minecraft is fire. Actually GOAT game and amazing with friends

[–] bananabenana@lemmy.world 51 points 5 months ago (5 children)

Taking the time to learn gimp is worthwhile. Its really powerful once you know how to use it IMO

[–] bananabenana@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Is this loss?

[–] bananabenana@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Absolutely not true. Fungi are weird but not this weird. Citation please

[–] bananabenana@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Open access credits is a fantastic idea. Unfortunately it goes against the business model of these parasites. Ultimately, these businesses provide little to no actual value except siphoning taxpayer money. I really prefer eLifes current model but it would be great if it was cheaper. arXiv, Biorxiv provides a better service than most journals IMO

Also I agree with the reviewing seriously and twice as often as publishing. Many people leave academia so reviewing more can cover them.

[–] bananabenana@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] bananabenana@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

Tbh I'm here for it. The reboot trilogy is legitimately fantastic and beautifully realised films

[–] bananabenana@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Three robust genetics papers using different sequences and genes, each time place it as a sister group to Archosauria:

248 nuclear genes (187,026 nucleotide sites): https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3473239/

1145 ultraconserved elements (UCEs) and their variable flanking DNA: https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsbl.2012.0331

1,113 single-copy coding genes, robustly indicated that turtles are likely to be a sister group of crocodilians and birds: https://www.nature.com/articles/ng.2615

This level of genetic evidence is an overwhelmingly strong signal, regarding relationships and recent common ancestry to extant species. I would say it is undeniably strong. You cannot possibly get evolutionary convergence over this many genetic loci.

[–] bananabenana@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Maybe we're not talking about the same thing? I was thinking about the diapsid debate, where genetic evidence is overwhelmingly strong in favour for diapsid evolution Mitochondrial DNA evidence: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC24355/ Micro RNA evidence: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21775315/

Tbh a core multi gene ML tree to all other reptiles would prove it beyond a shadow of a doubt, maybe someone's done that already but I haven't been able to find it.

view more: next ›