[-] blargerer@kbin.melroy.org 2 points 3 weeks ago

This is just survivorship bias right? The ones that get caught are hard to hide. That's part of why they got caught.

[-] blargerer@kbin.melroy.org 19 points 1 month ago

Never doubt the impact bad incentives can have on a large group of individual actors.

[-] blargerer@kbin.melroy.org 34 points 1 month ago

bsky doesn't have an algorithm. If that was on their feed they followed the person or were looking at a relevant feed.

[-] blargerer@kbin.melroy.org 23 points 1 month ago

There was absolutely a sweet period around when indy games were taking off and after game guides had fallen out of favour, where secrets like this in medium sized games (or huge indy hits) could remain for years.

[-] blargerer@kbin.melroy.org 2 points 1 month ago

She doesn't really have an official policy yet. Not surprising given the number of issues she needs positions on and how quickly this campaign needed to spin up. She basically went straight into campaign events. Presumably she'll have a platform by the DNC

[-] blargerer@kbin.melroy.org 7 points 1 month ago

That seems like a bad policy.

[-] blargerer@kbin.melroy.org 21 points 1 month ago

If you are serious about losing weight, what I would suggest you do is start recording what you are eating in detail to see where the calories are actually coming from. Make a spreadsheet and track it. Also if you aren't already active, pick up some activity to become less sedentary. Doesn't need to be working out, could be a sport, could be going for more walks.

[-] blargerer@kbin.melroy.org 20 points 1 month ago

Can you give an example of what you currently eat? I.. doubt you aren't losing weight if you are really eating 900 calories a day.

[-] blargerer@kbin.melroy.org 80 points 1 month ago

This is what most hacking is.

[-] blargerer@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 1 month ago

Sure of the first point I guess? I'm not some huge advocate of this technology, I'm just saying it's not an apples to apples comparison where you can simply say its 4x worse.

On the second point, no. It takes 10s or 100s of millions of years for coal/oil to form. And most of the stuff we mine/drill for was formed from trees before bacteria/fungus evolved ways to break down cellulose, so dead trees just piled up. Its plausible that its never removed from the carbon cycle unless we are the ones to put it back where we got it from. It will certainly not happen on human time scales.

[-] blargerer@kbin.melroy.org 18 points 1 month ago

Eeeh. Its reasonably to try I guess, but looking at the examples, its cherry picked promotional materials where the words jump and dive were used as swimming related puns for going to the museum. None of them were literal advertisements about jumping into the sprinkle pool.

view more: next ›

blargerer

joined 2 months ago