[-] brain_pan@infosec.pub 4 points 11 months ago

drug joke, I think

[-] brain_pan@infosec.pub 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

he does not think about lemmy, we should likewise think of him less

[-] brain_pan@infosec.pub 18 points 1 year ago

perhaps it's not possible; the crunch strategy isn't working (and is grinding up and spitting out devs)

[-] brain_pan@infosec.pub 12 points 1 year ago

fr

Reddit Exodus: "reddit is being corporate and shitty and greedy, time to bounce"

Facebook shows up: "oh, let's let them; in fact, we should be happy that they're coming to the fediverse! only good things can come from this"

like it's as if y'all forgot the thing that just happened; why are you all so quick to give the corporation that only cares for money a chance

[-] brain_pan@infosec.pub 0 points 1 year ago

you are an example of why they're so strict about it

[-] brain_pan@infosec.pub 1 points 1 year ago

I'd think that most OG lemmy users were people like that, so it's not "small"

[-] brain_pan@infosec.pub 7 points 1 year ago

imo, the dicey part of the matter is "what amount of the AI's dataset is made up of actual images of children"

[-] brain_pan@infosec.pub 1 points 1 year ago

exactly what I was thinking

and on top of that what happens with a proven bad actor

would they be allowed to just jump to a new instance to harrass people?

[-] brain_pan@infosec.pub 1 points 1 year ago

you actually think corporations will always keep their word, don't you

and that somehow Google acting like it does is like some fluke or one bad apple or something, rather than Google acting in ways very normal and common to corporations

[-] brain_pan@infosec.pub 1 points 1 year ago

tbf, that's every social network isn't it?

[-] brain_pan@infosec.pub 9 points 1 year ago

they're actually asking, so be serious

[-] brain_pan@infosec.pub 12 points 1 year ago

wait, again??

view more: next ›

brain_pan

joined 1 year ago