constate368

joined 1 year ago
[–] constate368@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

they just wanna suck me

[–] constate368@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

He’s pretending that Israel has no other options.

Might want to brush up on your reading comprehension if this is hard for you to understand.

[–] constate368@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

beyond an elementary school level

Math and literacy are both fundamental and essential tools for a self sufficient adult.

Lol, the ironing.

[–] constate368@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (4 children)

So it's better these children die than the soldiers killing them put their lives at risk?

[–] constate368@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's about being in the free software ecosystem, which is really a licensing issue.

Forcing people to contribute their modifications to software when they are editing free software ensures we're never dependent on the decisions of one entity. This is what the GNU General Public License (GPL) is all about.

If we don't like what someone did, we can take that part out and redistribute a better version that we can continue to modify. This might not matter to someone who doesn't program, but it should.

You don't have to be the one to get your hands dirty with code. Just being a user in the ecosystem opens you up to these benefits. Other people are going to take advantage of them, and you can just piggyback on their work.

I, personally, think it's always just a matter of time before businesses make products worse by charging more/giving less. Look at Adobe. Look at Microsoft. Look at Apple. All of them want to lock people into endless subscriptions because they're dependent on their ecosystem. What happens when Adobe decides they're not charging enough for photoshop? They charge more, and everyone just has to deal with it. Same goes for Office. Same goes for Apple, they just do it the old-fashioned way by charging for the latest versions and making you buy new hardware.

[–] constate368@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What does the civilian:soldier death ratio need to be in order for it to be considered a 'legitimate military target'?

[–] constate368@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

🥱

So original

view more: next ›