[-] crashex@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Very nicely put. I've used all this for deep reflection about my internetting as well and I don't think I have come to terms with everywhere being ruined by corporate. It's not like they don't fuck us over as well in the real world and I now realize what kind of fight we're in on- and offline. Don't want to give up any bit of space to evil corporations. I think it's easy to create really quiet Lemmy instances (or other social sites, federated or not) where one can rest from all those aggressive algorithms, and if I do it at some point I will make it very connected to real life and good for information gathering. Other than that, I like real life, I'm not interested in much virtual stuff.

[-] crashex@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

These products - Googles convenience products as well as the Social Media shite - were introduced gradually at the time. The single steps people took towards using these products seemed innocuous. Before you know it, your whole life is enmeshed in a privacy nightmare and the convenience and quality you were used to is gone. It's like buying an apartment in a nice place of town and then within the next two decades the area turns into a shady ghetto slum.

[-] crashex@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I was trying so much to get rid of that shit. No luck, everyone and their dog only knows of Whatsapp and will not use other apps

[-] crashex@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Git seems to be a good way to approach this. It's funny that I never really had to get around to what Git actually is (some thingy to store files for programmer teams?). For a somewhat technophile but non-IT person it's all a bit overwhelming.

[-] crashex@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

All you guys think fandom type wikis. I am thinking about practical knowledge. A wiki about donkey care can very well need a quick link to a wiki about medicinal plants, and wikis about adjacent practical topics, or think for example car tuners and motorbike tuners - they might like to have different wikis but will have lots of similar or equal topics. Wouldn't a federated wiki mean it can be better protected from attempts of centralized censorship?

[-] crashex@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

This is what I mean. Lots of small wikis, like subreddits, like the old forums, only that a wiki setup seem to me a better way to collect and present knowledge than the forums, mailing lists, facebook groups, subreddits or wherever we used to put our stuff.

[-] crashex@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

What does the 'blockchain' component do? Not sure what it means compared with a regular platform.

[-] crashex@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Sounds cool. Does that mean we need heavy disks full of data everywhere or is there a magicky way around it?

[-] crashex@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Self hosting at home is out of the question. I use an antenna to suck enough internet out of the air for daily needs in my remote valley. So I have started a small wiki farm on my webspace (is that indeed the same a tech person calls a VPN?)

[-] crashex@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I would want, for example, be capable of easily linking between the info for a particular plant in my botany wiki and my herbalism wiki. But I don't want to overwhelm the botany wiki contributor with a heavy list of medical input fields when he enters a new article.

[-] crashex@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Can you explain what this does like I'm 5 please?

[-] crashex@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Is there an explanation for stupid of how SearXNG works? I tried it for a while after getting too frustrated with the Google enshittification, but couldn't get results really.

33

I keep feeling frustrated as valuable knowledge for my different hobbies over the last years became siloed away in corporate social media. I believe wikis could be a way out, but can we have decentralized, federated wiki software that can kind of talk among each other?

view more: next ›

crashex

joined 1 year ago