credo

joined 8 months ago
[–] credo@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

Does it 3D?

[–] credo@lemmy.world 14 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

What is that- double strand? Weak.

B-

Edit: For the uninitiated.

[–] credo@lemmy.world 15 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

How come we don’t call cruise missiles, “suicide rockets”?

[–] credo@lemmy.world 11 points 19 hours ago

So DOGE is getting cut then?

[–] credo@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

You added a zero (to yesterday’s tally).

And is casualties, not deaths. Casualties includes wounded.

[–] credo@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I hear it’s going to make a comeback soon.

[–] credo@lemmy.world 18 points 5 days ago (4 children)

It’s too complicated to say “a surplus”.

[–] credo@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago

I don’t think there is room for any more text.

I hope OP gets it right this time.

[–] credo@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

I want your in my.

Predictions are turned off.

[–] credo@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago

I’m guessing it was prioritized by the amount of evidence, and the chances of getting a conviction.

[–] credo@lemmy.world 24 points 5 days ago

I mean, I wouldn’t want to get attacked by a conspiracy theorist (that sounds wrong) either.

 

For the first time since 538 published our presidential election forecast for Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump, Trump has taken the lead (if a very small one) over Harris. As of 3 p.m. Eastern on Oct. 18, our model gives Trump a 52-in-100 chance of winning the majority of Electoral College votes. The model gives Harris a 48-in-100 chance.

 

It’s kinda how you read the name, innit?

 
view more: next ›