[-] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

For #2,

For gaming, if you use steam, you may not face more than the following:

  • game does not work with no well known way to resolve. You can find this out by checking protonDB
  • game does not work because it needs to enable some options. Very easy to fix, and you can find the options on proton db for each game.
  • does not work because you didn't setup steam right. You often need to enable proton, which in short is steam's emulator or windows
  • does not work because your gpu drivers did not install. This depends on distro and they should all have a guide on how to do it, but usually it is just a matter of installing something.

For programming, you will love your life because everything programming is way easier on Linux.

[-] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

For #1, I've made the realization that most distros are lightweight skins or addons on top of another distro. Most of the time, if you start with the base distro, all you have to do is install some apps, change some configurations, and suddenly you have that other distro. It is much easier than doing a reinstallation.

If you filter out all of these distros that only do a little on top of an existing, you're left with a quite small number actually. I'd bet it's less than 10 that are not super niche. Fedora, Arch, debian, gentoo, nixos are the big ones. There's some niche ones, like void Linux and Alpine.

So I'd say if you try all of those, you don't need to try any more 😁

[-] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago

First time Linux user you mean?

I wouldn't recommend it, unless you can navigate the terminal well. When you install arch, it installs no desktop environment, only the ability to talk to a terminal.

It's technically possible and very doable with some googling, but I wouldn't recommend it.

[-] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

Well I am speaking about users who may be picky about mastodon's features. If someone is picky, I don't imagine they'd care much about just finding a platform with their preferred features, similar to how they didn't like mastodon and found bluesky instead.

[-] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

* spontaneously combusting * NOOOO

[-] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

The fediverse has many micro blogging implementations outside of mastodon if you don't like their featureset (and they federate with each other, unlike bluesky). The only features I couldn't find are those that contributed to making Twitter the dystopian toxic space that it is.

[-] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Is anyone here opposed to bringing more people? I'm upset that people are going to an unfederated platform like BlueSky. I wish more people to join, no matter who they are.

I haven't been on mastodon much, but lemmy is quite diverse.

[-] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

Very much the same. I was terrified of regex, now I love it

[-] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 month ago

I preferred the Internet that isn't driven by non-genuine posts by profit driven influencers. I am glad that those people don't like mastodon so they don't ruin another platform.

[-] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago

It's not the best platform for the profit driven, and I much prefer it that way.

[-] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

Oh no, now nostr is ruined

[-] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago

And you'd still have federation issues, so doesn't solve OP's problem.

25
submitted 8 months ago by cyclohexane@lemmy.ml to c/antiwork@lemmy.ml

I am looking to contribute to striker funds, if possible. I am located in the US, hence why I choose it.

I am hoping for striker funds that would be effective enough to make change. In other words, they may be the last thing a group of workers needed to decide to strike.

I am hoping the fund is efficient in managing its funds, rather than a significant fraction going to administrative costs. Very preferred if the fund's financials are fully transparent.

Any recommendations?

57
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by cyclohexane@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Can anyone recommend cheap laptops that have good build quality and see lightweight?

I aim to use it for programming, but I connect to my desktop for most hefty work so it doesn't need to have solid performance. 8 GB RAM, 256 GB storage are enough for me. a lower grade CPU would still be good; a i3 that's 6 cores is enough.

What's really important to me is build quality, especially the keyboard. I also don't want it to be big. 13" would be enough, but not too picky here.

Any recommendations? And are there any communities that are better to ask this in?

Budget: I am hoping to pay $400 or less, but willing to pay $1000 or even more if it's justified or the value is worthwhile

OS: Linux. I can install it myself.

79
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by cyclohexane@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml

Tiling window manager users: how exactly do you use yours?

Do you have advanced keybindings for bringing up frequently used programs?

Are there less common layouts you use frequently?

Do you use any advanced or fancy features?

77
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by cyclohexane@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml

Context

I want to host public-facing applications on a server in my home, without compromising security. I realize containers might be one way to do this, and want to explore that route further.

Requirements

I want to run applications within containers such that they

  • Must not be able to interfere with applications running on host
  • Must not be able to interfere with other containers or applications inside them
  • Must have no access or influence on other devices in the local network, or otherwise compromise the security of the network, but still accessible by devices via ssh.

Note: all of this within reason. I understand that sometimes there may be occasional vulnerabilities, like in kernel for example, that would eventually get fixed. Risks like this within reason I am willing to accept.

What I found so far

  • Running containers in rootless mode: in other words, running the container daemon with an unprivileged host user
  • Running applications in container under unprivileged users: the container user under which the container is ran should be unprivileged
  • Networking: The container's networking must be restricted. I am still not sure how to do this and shall explore it more, but would appreciate any resources.

Alternative solution

I have seen bubblewrap presented as an alternative, but it seems like it is not intended to be used directly in this manner, and information about using it for this is scarce.

484
submitted 10 months ago by cyclohexane@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml

Image Alt Text: "After downloading a 2.5GB movie

Me: Presses play Movie unsupported file" A person is shown with eyes on her laptop punching the wall beside her, causing it to crack.

377
submitted 10 months ago by cyclohexane@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
195
submitted 10 months ago by cyclohexane@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml

This is a major escalation that could greatly expand the war and drag hezbollah deeper into the war, which was already involved in skirmishes with Israel in Lebanese regions that Israel occupies.

Note: the verbiage of the article is minimizing the focus on Israel, and they spend half the article justifying the attack as "not an attack on Israel" an effort to minimize how much of an escalation this is.

23
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by cyclohexane@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml

EDIT: I enabled CONFIG_MSDOS_PARTITION and that caused it to work. It had nothing to do with the device itself but the partition type on the sd card.

Thank you do much rattking for the help!

Original post:

Hi all, I am using a custom configured linux kernel (Gentoo), with very few things enabled. It has done me very well so far and taught me a bunch, but there's one small issue I have been having lately that is annoying. My SD-card reader (a USB device) is not working, but it works perfectly fine on my arch linux laptop without any kernel configurations.

Is it possible to tell which drivers or kernel configurations I need by looking at the laptop that is working?

More context about the issue

On the machine where it is not working, after plugging the device in, I see this in lsblk output:

NAME        MAJ:MIN RM   SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINTS
sda           8:0    1  59.5G  0 disk 
nvme0n1     259:0    0 400G  0 disk 
├─nvme0n1p1 259:1    0     1G  0 part /boot
└─nvme0n1p2 259:2    0 400G  0 part /

The device does show sda but no sda/sda1. This is opposite to the laptop, where I do see a sda1 below the sda device, which I can mount using mount /dev/sda1 /mnt/point

What I tried

I tried enabling the following kernel configurations: MMC MMC_BLOCK MMC_SDHCI MMC_SDHCI_PCI MMC_RICOH_MMC MMC_SDHCI_ACPI

Still, this did not change the result.

I tried looking into the logs, but could not find anything interesting. I am using the sysklogd system logger instead of systemd's journalctl

The reader I bought

I bought this a long time ago from amazon: https://algopix.com/products/B08N4N7Q7J-zhoubin-usb-30-sd-card-reader-for-sdxc-sdhc-sd-mmc-rsmmc-micro-sdxc-micro-sd

Yes I know I cheaped out. But it worked for me until I tried it on this one computer, so I wish to make it work.

Final Question

How can I make this work?

42
submitted 10 months ago by cyclohexane@lemmy.ml to c/firefox@lemmy.ml

there are more options that I thought. Any reason to go with Tridactyl's competitors?

125

it seems ridiculous that we have to embed an entire browser, meant for internet web browsing, just to create a cross-platform UI with moderate ease.

Why are native or semi-native UI frameworks lagging so far behind? am I wrong in thinking this? are there easier, declarative frameworks for creating semi-native UIs on desktop that don't look like windows 1998?

32
submitted 11 months ago by cyclohexane@lemmy.ml to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

I am wanting to self host a fediverse instance. I don't hope to make it big. Hoping for 200 users at most, and I won't advertise it heavily so it'll probably be a while before it gets there.

Is it a bad idea to host something like this on local hardware at home? I have a lot of local-only self hosted services, and I wouldn't want those to be compromised.

But my biggest fear is overloading my network. I already don't get the fastest signal in some parts of my house, and I am worried the extra traffic might put more pressure on the network.

What are your thoughts on hosting local? Should I just avoid the headache and host on public instance?

29
submitted 11 months ago by cyclohexane@lemmy.ml to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

Something small and 2 or 4 GB RAM. Raspberry pi's compute power is good enough for me, I'm not doing anything too intensive.

Is raspberry pi 4 still the best answer?

I am a tinkerer and don't mind tinkering. I typically use Gentoo Linux as main OS. I also don't mind ARM or other architectures. I've been eyeing the RockPro64 as well.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

cyclohexane

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF