[-] czech@no.faux.moe 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Found Elon's number one fan. Thanks for a good laugh.

Quoted for posterity:

Stop believing what you read without real world experience. Seriously, you’re what’s wrong with social media. You’re so gullible you believe everything you read.

Is FSD perfect or even good yet? No. But I promise you it’s better than any other option out there. I’ve personally used ford, Volvo ridden in waymo and own FSD. It’s not close.

Don’t pretend to know what Teslas mission is. Because you obviously don’t.

Your comments are so laughably ignorant it’s hard to even understand what your point it other than hatred for Musk.

[-] czech@no.faux.moe 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Looks like cameras were introduced in 2021. When was my incident?

[-] czech@no.faux.moe 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's the first time you mentioned a camera; there is no "again".

But what does that change if its still being advertised as self-driving?

People are idiots. They rationalize the safety features e.g. " oh, its not yet approved by regulators so they must use the driver-cam but Musk has said its self-driving so its okay".

Remember that the idea is to DEVELOP self driving software so that the roads can be SAFER (not 100% safe but safer) from idiot humans.

Umm what? The idea is to turn a profit for shareholders. Musk is not Tony Stark. In fact Tesla is now behind other self-driving platforms because Musk does not prioritize safety.
https://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk-demanded-cameras-over-radar-in-self-driving-cars-nytimes-2021-12

[-] czech@no.faux.moe 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

My uber was a Tesla once. The guy was convinced he could text and drive just fine on the highway. Looked at me like I was a total Karen. The average person is an idiot. Thats the crux of the issue.

[-] czech@no.faux.moe 9 points 1 year ago

Yet so many Tesla owners still think its self-driving. Maybe because that's how its been marketed for years.

https://files.catbox.moe/vcwliq.png

Do you get it, now?

[-] czech@no.faux.moe 3 points 1 year ago

In my experience its toast. SD cards are not reliable.

[-] czech@no.faux.moe 0 points 1 year ago

you unbearably smug cunt.

[-] czech@no.faux.moe 6 points 1 year ago

Just because the second verse literally has its own implied threat does not mean the first verse is unrelated. In songs and paragraphs adjacent sentences are typically related- its how English works- but I can't speak for all languages.

[-] czech@no.faux.moe 1 points 1 year ago

Its the same as dying. If you're that blase about dying then yea- makes no difference.

[-] czech@no.faux.moe 3 points 1 year ago

The problem with the clone is that the original "you" died in the transporter. Are you assuming your conscious transfers?

[-] czech@no.faux.moe 18 points 1 year ago

Yes the implied violence and the introduction of grandpas gun are purely coincidental! How misleading of OP!

[-] czech@no.faux.moe 25 points 1 year ago

Hey, I'm a little nervous 'bout this guy!

2
Bella Loves Laundry (no.faux.moe)
submitted 1 year ago by czech@no.faux.moe to c/cat@lemmy.world
view more: next ›

czech

joined 1 year ago