[-] d13@programming.dev 4 points 1 week ago

Maybe unpopular opinion here, but I just read The Three Musketeers, and it's not even close to The Count of Monte Cristo.

The characters wildly change in tone and basic morals, the heroes are dirtbags, and the plot wanders.

I still enjoyed it, but it just wasn't the same.

[-] d13@programming.dev 3 points 2 weeks ago

“It is possible to commit no mistakes and still lose. You lost today Mr. La Forge, but that doesn't mean you have to like it."

[-] d13@programming.dev 5 points 1 month ago

Largely agree, with a couple exceptions: Undiscovered Country and First Contact are good; Into Darkness is bad.

[-] d13@programming.dev 5 points 1 month ago

There's a chain near me that makes a breakfast sandwich with eggs, bacon, white cheddar, a really excellent garlic aioli, and Ciabatta bread.

I go there way too much.

[-] d13@programming.dev 18 points 1 month ago

This might be my biggest TNG complaint. The character and the actor are good (or at least decent if we're being picky), but almost every time the focus is on her, the writing is absolutely awful.

[-] d13@programming.dev 7 points 1 month ago

Fringe is great. Season 1 is a bit "Monster of the week" but when it gets going it's a great ride.

[-] d13@programming.dev 4 points 2 months ago

If you haven't seen it, Ex Machina (2014) fits the vibe of your list. It's one of my favorites.

[-] d13@programming.dev 20 points 3 months ago

The Punt for Red October

(Assuming American Football)

[-] d13@programming.dev 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

It has my favorite user interface, but I feel that it bogs down after viewing a series of images. ~~I also feel that development has stalled a bit~~ (edit, I was mistaken: they just released a pre release).

I haven't found a better one, though. Next best so far has been Racoon.

[-] d13@programming.dev 4 points 4 months ago

I wonder if they are preparing to stop using it. That could be a benign reason for the change in wording.

[-] d13@programming.dev 3 points 4 months ago

This doesn't exactly match your goals, but you may be able to adapt it or take pieces from it.

I have containers running on two subnets:

  1. LAN + Tailscale
  2. LAN only

Subnet 1 has a DNS server, which resolves all of my services to IPs on either subnet.

I have Tailscale set up on a machine as a subnet router (directing to Subnet 1).

Result:

  1. When local, I can access all services on the LAN with local DNS entries, both Subnet 1 and 2.
  2. When remote via Tailscale, I can access all services on Subnet 1 with the same local DNS entries. I cannot access services on Subnet 2.

This is nice because my apps don't care which network I'm on, they just use the same URL to connect. And the sensitive stuff (usually management tools) are not accessible remotely.

It's also ridiculously simple: Only one Tailscale service is running at home.

This does not solve your issue of broadcasting vs not broadcasting, though. There's probably other things missing as well. But maybe it's a start?

[-] d13@programming.dev 36 points 5 months ago

the AI that wrote the article

The linked article is by Dan Goodin from Ars Technica. He's not immune to mistakes, but he's been writing good articles about security for years.

Can we please not accuse everybody of being AI just because they made a mistake?

view more: next ›

d13

joined 1 year ago