[-] dango@fedia.io 3 points 1 year ago

@Etnies419 no, if you read the article even linking requires payment. That's why they're removing results entirely, rather than just removing summaries like they did in other countries

But to the point, in those countries leaving the links but removing the summaries also resulted in significant reductions in traffic for the news orgs.

@NarrativeBear @fubo

[-] dango@fedia.io 5 points 1 year ago

@fubo yeah, unfortunately these types of laws try to have their cake and eat it too

A similar law was passed in France, and predictably France news orgs lost significant traffic and cried foul.

It makes no sense to charge a search engine for the privilege of bringing customers to your website, and these types of laws always have predictable outcomes.

[-] dango@fedia.io 4 points 1 year ago

Who cares if they want to install xyz software [in their home directory]? Chances are it'll be a free boost for performance and/or morale.

This /really/ depends on your threat model. "xyz software in their home directory" could easily be "exfil tool that uploads all data employee X has access too, disguised as a meme template generator"

[-] dango@fedia.io 5 points 1 year ago

Texas republican voters don't care, and the rest of the texans who didn't vote for this are also the most impacted.

[-] dango@fedia.io 38 points 1 year ago

no way. this kind of elitism and gatekeeping kills communities

dango

joined 1 year ago