[-] davidalso@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago
[-] davidalso@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

I'm so square I didn't even know that 196 went back to Reddit.

Thank you.

[-] davidalso@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Months after joining I still cannot decipher the rule thing. Can you please tell me?

[-] davidalso@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

One of the top 100 reasons I left.

[-] davidalso@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I wish you were my neighbor

[-] davidalso@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

One key to happiness for me is to start from the assumption that I've been unclear.

[-] davidalso@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

This feels like reading a language that you only kinda know.

[-] davidalso@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Ok so in defense of dumbasses, we don't always understand the question. Eg, whose left? In those cases we don't want to make your clarify the question and drag things out, so we give you what we hope is an unequivocally clear response. It comes from a deep-seeded fear of miscommunication resulting in too many mailboxes with their flags on the wrong side or whatever. We apologize for the pedantry, though. I get that it's annoying.

[-] davidalso@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Lol. That one makes me strip a gear.

[-] davidalso@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Although completely reasonable, I fear that your conclusion is inaccessible for most folks.

And as a pedestrian, I'm all for a system that's capable of reducing distracted driving.

[-] davidalso@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Agreed. I'm just pointing out that people need to focus on the latter rather than the former.

[-] davidalso@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

That's the part that I don't think is a strong argument though. They were crying fraud long before the election, e.g., saying that mail-in ballots were illegal, claiming people were stuffing drop-off, etc. None of it was valid, but their argument was well established before election day.

view more: next ›

davidalso

joined 1 year ago