deadcade

joined 1 year ago
[–] deadcade@lemmy.deadca.de 22 points 1 month ago (7 children)

SteamOS is not the same as its base Arch Linux. If you want something slightly easier but still Arch-based, try EndeavourOS (but please not Manjaro).

If you have the time, try switching on your own terms within the next year. It's almost guaranteed you'll run into issues, but trying to dual-boot now rather than later gives you all the time you need to figure it out before MS forces you on Windows 11.

[–] deadcade@lemmy.deadca.de 11 points 1 month ago

According to Jim Starkey, the person who coined the term, "Blob don't stand for nothin'." However, it is often referred to as a "Binary Large OBject", meaning a large file with content not easily readable by people.

With an open source project, you have source code which is turned into executables/"blobs" by the compiler. As long as you trust the compiler, you can (functionally) know the content of the blobs by looking at the source code they were made from.

In the case of Ventoy, several "blobs" are included from an unknown or vague origin. This is a great way to bundle malware, as seen with the XZ backdoor from earlier this year. As such, the original creator of the linked issue is requesting they are built/obtained at compile time, so either the content or origin of these files can easily be found.

[–] deadcade@lemmy.deadca.de 13 points 1 month ago

DuckDuckGo's webbrowser is somewhat unique, in the sense that it isn't its own browser at all. It's a "WebView", using the OS built-in webbrowser with a coat of paint.

This means it's Blink/Chromium on Android and Windows, and WebKit on iOS and macOS.

[–] deadcade@lemmy.deadca.de 56 points 1 month ago (15 children)

Yes. There's only 3 major browsers. Chromium (Chrome), Firefox, WebKit (Safari). Nearly every other webbrowser is a fork of one of these, most are forks of Chromium, including Opera. As such, most webbrowsers will be affected by the change.

[–] deadcade@lemmy.deadca.de 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Still doesn't make a VPN the "magic all in one solution" it claims to be. And SNI is encrypted on newer servers using encrypted client hello (ECH).

In terms of privacy, you're switching around which entity gets to see a ton of details. Do you trust random public wifi enough, given modern security standards? Or do you trust a VPN company more, despite false advertising?

Use HTTPS and DoH (Becoming a default on some Android versions), and the average person will be just fine without a VPN.

[–] deadcade@lemmy.deadca.de 1 points 1 month ago

No, this is Patrick!

[–] deadcade@lemmy.deadca.de 12 points 1 month ago

Goblin' deez nuts

[–] deadcade@lemmy.deadca.de 10 points 1 month ago

The actual cheaters completely bypassed the new anti-cheat in about 6 hours. They had to update their cheats a bit, but are otherwise essentially unaffected. Linux users, Steam Deck users, and people who don't want to give a single game full hardware access, are all affected. None of those can play GTA:Online anymore, unless they mod the game to bypass the anti-cheat, which can be seen as cheating in itself, and could result in a ban.

The ddos attacks are likely being orchestrated by a small group of people or even an individual, it probably does not represent the vast majority of affected users.

[–] deadcade@lemmy.deadca.de 10 points 1 month ago

Linux, it fits my needs better on desktop, and is much less painful to troubleshoot than Windows, with more freedom and control than macOS.

[–] deadcade@lemmy.deadca.de 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I took a shortcut when typing that, quoting the OP instead of further explaining. It is definitely possible to visualize 4 datapoints, but not 4 spatial dimensions. The only way to do so is to project to lower dimensions or take a lower dimension slice and display that. That works for 2D slices/projections of 3D objects because we already have a full understanding of 3D. It does not work for 2D projections of 4D objects, similar to how "flatlanders" couldn't make sense of a 2D or 1D projection of a 3D object.

[–] deadcade@lemmy.deadca.de 21 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Wasted my time watching this. 23 minute video that repeats itself so often there's only ~30 seconds of information. It feels very AI-generated. And it is not possible to "visualize 4D", the video does not prove otherwise.

view more: ‹ prev next ›