dgerard

Baldur Bjarnason (who hates AI slop) has posited precisely this:

My current theory is that the main difference between open source and closed source when it comes to the adoption of “AI” tools is that open source projects generally have to ship working code, whereas closed source only needs to ship code that runs.

I asked Github Copilot and it added import wreak to .NET, so we'll get back to you.

Maxine Waters hates crypto bullshit with the fire of a thousand suns, she's not in power any more but she can help jam this up

Gold Buttplug
He's the man
The man with the Midas arse
Pretty girl, beware of his plug of gold
This butt is cold

lol holy shit

when did we get goldbugs here

bitcoin is more stupid, but goldbugging is not not stupid

yay goldbugs

the other two answers are correct, but also they totally do. In particular, the blockchain analysis companies alert companies using their services to the transaction touching tainted coins. This is variably effective, of course.

But also, there are plenty of non-US/EU exchanges that don't give a hoot and once tainted coins hit an exchange they're washed because these exchanges are very good at having pretend KYC/AML.

video version, double episode!!

this video had so many technical hiccups. the front fell off. (literally, my teleprompter tablet's screen came unglued and fell off. what the.) openshot decided rendering was toooo haaaard and i had to make a copy of the source video with a keyframe every 10 frames. fucking computers.

i'm sure they're working for someone

my god incredible, what a clever and likable fellow

Michel is great and you should follow him if you enjoy crypto shenanigans