dx1

joined 1 year ago
[–] dx1@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I think the total number killed by Hamas rockets EVER is like 30 to 50. Might be a little off. It's more about draining Israel's money and putting up a show than anything else.

[–] dx1@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Hamas's cited reason was that Israel was demanding female soldiers, while the terms of the "pause" dictated the exchange of civilians. It seemed like Israel simply wanted an excuse to continue bombing.

let’s be honest it’s because all the rape and torture would make their propaganda war tricky

Let's be honest about this having no substantiation at present and being based on Israeli and U.S. State Dept propaganda. Honestly it's disgusting how quickly people will resort to insinuations like this.

[–] dx1@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (8 children)

What's the standard for this in the U.S.? It reaches only as far up the ladder as anyone can definitively prove. Abu Gharib saw like, what, a lieutenant fired or something. But when it's "the enemy", all of a sudden we assume by default the decision came from the highest levels, and it's carte blanche to wipe out 2.5 million people living in a giant concentration camp, in a supposed attempt to do regime change.

[–] dx1@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (32 children)

Israel doesn't care about their citizens, they're carpet bombing Gaza and flooding tunnels they know the hostages are in. They had the option to just do a hostage exchange since day one. This is some mixture of annexation and Netanyahu trying to hold on to power.

[–] dx1@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (14 children)

It might be time for Israel to agree with the hostage exchange Hamas put forward a bunch of times and stop genociding the civilian population of Gaza.

[–] dx1@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago (7 children)

Hamas killed 1200 with about 500 to 600 civilian deaths

Minus a few hundred Israel killed with "friendly fire".

[–] dx1@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

Of course it's feasible. Biden literally cannot win, it's in fact the only option if you don't want to see GOP in power again.

[–] dx1@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Prohibition? We still have drug prohibition. Woman's suffrage? It's something, but women's votes still are as useless as everyone else's, especially if you refuse to vote for anything to actually change (and they still have a wage gap). 75-day school year - what? Jim Crow? Improvements but black communities institutionalized, ghettoized, gunned down by cops, and still a wage gap. See prohibition.

Plus, now our government is totalitarian, eating a third of GDP, massive surveillance state, largest military on earth, quarter of the prisoner's on Earth, constantly trying to censor the internet, economy is insanely unequal and getting worse, inflation over the long term getting worse and wages not keeping up with them, housing prices skyrocketing, and currently openly engaged in a genocide despite nation-wide protests. Need me to keep going?

[–] dx1@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Wow, sorry, didn't realize this was still going.

What is my feasible solution? General strike and/or total shift to third party to implement direct democracy. 100 million people can go out and waste their vote on a petty tyrant like Biden or Trump, or 100 million people can actually start making real changes. You're all in a prison of your own making.

[–] dx1@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Including Montana.

[–] dx1@lemmy.world -5 points 11 months ago

"Our democracy" has been dead for a century. You guys are like rats running around a maze with your moronic "lesser of two evils" between two parties all controlled by the same interests.

view more: next ›