That's irrelevant. Astronomy and polsci can both only test their hypotheses through observation.
exocrinous
What are soft sciences supposed to do when experimental methods are either impractical or unethical?
Same thing astronomy did.
Hey genius, if you need experimentation in order for a field to be a real science, then explain how astronomy is a science.
It's mainly called social science in my country.
Same with Astronomy.
Y'all straight people who only just heard of this discourse should spend more time listening to asexuals
They’re just being puritanical or shy with their movie watching company.
Or asexual and sex repulsed, or sexually traumatized. Why do you jump straight to calling people reactionaries when there are perfectly good legitimate reasons for their behaviour? It's almost like you don't believe in asexuals.
Can't you red card the bullies?
Well the last one was One so this one must be Two
For someone raised in a city, all bears are strange. Whereas, a man has to have some visible deviation from normal behaviour like a red armband or an anime porn hoodie in order to be strange.
Bill was great tho
No, it's observation. An experiment involves manipulating an independent variable while controlling other variables. There's none of that in space, not counting the ISS and Apollo. That said, you can still test hypotheses using observation. And that's equally true in both astronomy and in social sciences.