:(

Huh? Am I missing sarcasm or have we read two completely different articles?

but it seems more naughty that way

i thought the b was for bottom?

Fair, my point was: how is it important that we understand how consciousness works to see that the way consciousness creates Art is not very comparable to a machine recognizing patterns?

The commentor above has compared inspiration to the way AI Companies are using the labor of millions of artists for free. In this context I assume this is what they were hinting at when responding to "AI is not being inspired" with "we don't know how consciousness works"

Are you seriously suggesting that human creativity works by learning to reduce the amount of random noise they output by mapping words to patterns?

Is the world's copyright system flawed? Yes. Should it be completely removed? No, because otherwise a lot of creative branches would be unsustainable. Artists need money, musicians need money etc.

Isn't this a completely different conversation than the one we were having and kind of missing the point? Yes, imo you should be allowed to do that. Still, AI Companies are using the labor of millions of artist for free to train their AIs, which are then threatening to eliminate ways of these artist to gather income.

How is that related in any way to the ways that copyright has been exploited against fanmade art?

based on the vapor it could be a hot spring.

Oh this is what jordan peterson meant by Tar-Baby

i am sending this to every slayer fan in my contacts

love that song