[-] flamingos@ukfli.uk 34 points 5 months ago

According to this it's just a coincidence.

789
rule, innit (ukfli.uk)
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by flamingos@ukfli.uk to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
[-] flamingos@ukfli.uk 139 points 5 months ago

The most embarrassing thing is that they were so proud of this that they watermarked it.

[-] flamingos@ukfli.uk 1 points 5 months ago

I really don't get your position. You keep asserting that Starmer is "electable," but here you acknowledge that his action are alienating to both people within the party and outside of it.

The only thing Starmer has going for him is extreme luck. If Boris hadn't fucked up Covid so bad and made the Tories so unpopular, I doubt Starmer would have the capabilities to win this election.

69
submitted 5 months ago by flamingos@ukfli.uk to c/fediverse@lemmy.world
[-] flamingos@ukfli.uk 14 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

It amazing that this "you might not like him, but suck it up to get rid of the Tories" attitude wasn't present when Corbyn was leader. No, it was an endless tide of infighting, coups and splintering. How are we suppose to take these pleas to get rid of the Tories seriously after watching the Labour Right do everything in its power to hand the Tories the last two elections?

[-] flamingos@ukfli.uk 7 points 5 months ago

You consider two councillors that make decisions for just under 300K people to be non-entities? What does someone have to be to be worth reporting on for you?

[-] flamingos@ukfli.uk 2 points 5 months ago

NCD leans neocon if anything.

[-] flamingos@ukfli.uk 6 points 5 months ago

Provide the ability for users to migrate their account and all associated data (posts, comments, moderation actions, saved posts, etc.) from one Lemmy instance to another.

To implement this feature you'd either have to:

  • Edit the DB entries of every instance to match the new profile;
  • Create copies of the old content on the new instance and federate that out, thus duplicating all the data. You could have it delete the old content, but you'd still need to recreate all the posts and comments.

Either of these would be very susceptible to abuse. Giving bad actors a button to force instances to run hundreds, potentially thousands, of operations probably isn't the best of ideas.

496
Bridget rule (ukfli.uk)
submitted 5 months ago by flamingos@ukfli.uk to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
[-] flamingos@ukfli.uk 15 points 5 months ago

Why not both?

[-] flamingos@ukfli.uk 3 points 5 months ago

It's hard to give a direct source because he's deleted quite a bit but this thread has a screenshot.

[-] flamingos@ukfli.uk 34 points 5 months ago

Knuckles say & Sonic trans

[-] flamingos@ukfli.uk 28 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The person who runs it doesn't recommend Lemmy because of the political opinions of its main developers.

Kinda funny now given that Eugene of Mastodon has signed an NDA with Facebook.

125
touch rule (ukfli.uk)
submitted 6 months ago by flamingos@ukfli.uk to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
245
pension rule (ukfli.uk)
submitted 6 months ago by flamingos@ukfli.uk to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
1126
Script kiddies (ukfli.uk)
8
206
hypocr(ule)isy (ukfli.uk)
submitted 7 months ago by flamingos@ukfli.uk to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
115
Mouldy rule (ukfli.uk)
submitted 7 months ago by flamingos@ukfli.uk to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
1878
Two moods (ukfli.uk)
submitted 8 months ago by flamingos@ukfli.uk to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
308
credible rule (ukfli.uk)
submitted 8 months ago by flamingos@ukfli.uk to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
50
yemen rule (ukfli.uk)
submitted 8 months ago by flamingos@ukfli.uk to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
view more: next ›

flamingos

joined 8 months ago