geekwithsoul

joined 3 weeks ago

Have you ever heard the phrase "You can't reason someone out of an opinion that they didn't reason themselves into"? If they're objectively not fat, than what they're really saying is they feel like they're fat, not they they think that they're fat. That can be for a whole host of reasons, but arguing facts with them won't help. Far better to have discussions with them about why they feel that way and why they're focused on it. Ultimately it's an issue they have to resolve themselves and not something you can convince them of.

[–] geekwithsoul@piefed.social 10 points 1 day ago

Such changes are called germ-line mutations because they occur in a cell used in reproduction (germ cell), giving the change a chance to become more numerous over time. If the mutation has a deleterious affect on the phenotype of the offspring, the mutation is referred to as a genetic disorder. Alternately, if the mutation has a positive affect on the fitness of the offspring, it is called an adaptation. [Nature]

I'm assuming you mean "mutation that gets passed down". Whether a mutation is a disorder or an adaptation takes generations to determine, so we may not know the identity of the individual. Furthermore, what was once a disorder may become adaptive in a different environment and vice versa. In general, I suppose if it was adaptive, they might be called "ancestor" :)

More broadly, and outside of germ-line mutations (meaning it's not passed down to offspring), everyone has cells with mutations. The person doesn't have the mutation per se, but a cell or cluster of cells do, so identifying them by that mutation doesn't make a lot of sense. If it's bad, your body either kills it or it kills you (e.g. cancer). If it's good, it likely doesn't change anything significantly.

[–] geekwithsoul@piefed.social 27 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What the hell is this horseshit… from the AP?! That's a Sunday magazine puff piece. It's made him "grateful" and "appreciative"? No, it's made him even more reckless and reactionary than he was in his first term.

[–] geekwithsoul@piefed.social 3 points 2 days ago

Totally get that! Probably explains why I played as much Cyberpunk 2077 as I did! Books-wise, haven't been reading much cyberpunk lately other than some re-reads like Snow Crash and Diamond Age - mostly been escaping into Pratchett's Discworld. Comfort food as it were.

[–] geekwithsoul@piefed.social 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Yeah, figured that might be the case but thought I'd mention it just in case. Not sure what "new" cyberpunk is out there - especially since 2020… unless you count non-fiction :)

[–] geekwithsoul@piefed.social 6 points 2 days ago (4 children)

You didn't mention him, so maybe okay that his stuff is older, but check out Bruce Sterling

[–] geekwithsoul@piefed.social 39 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Why do you think Mastodon is exempt from those rules? The law applies to all sites/services with a significant UK audience - some of the Mastodon .uk instances will definitely be subject to this, and because of how badly the law is written, it can apply to many more.

People can have their hardon for hating Bluesky, but they're literally just trying to avoid being fined by the UK govt here - this wasn't their idea.

[–] geekwithsoul@piefed.social 74 points 3 days ago (8 children)

The UK government is forcing them and all other web services to do the same. UK-hosted Mastodon servers may coast under the radar for awhile, but they'll come for them eventually.

Rather than getting mad at Bluesky for implementing government-mandated age verification, how about actually getting mad at the UK government?

[–] geekwithsoul@piefed.social 89 points 3 days ago (13 children)

Yeah, I get pushing for Mastodon over Bluesky, but Bluesky is being forced to do this by the UK government for UK citizens so this is just exaggerated rage bait.

[–] geekwithsoul@piefed.social 3 points 3 days ago

Same for me with the same error

[–] geekwithsoul@piefed.social 2 points 3 days ago

Verizon's customer portal. Clunky, badly designed interface and what should be simple tasks end in dead pages, non-responsive widgets, and interminable loading screens. Just awful.

[–] geekwithsoul@piefed.social 1 points 4 days ago

None of the age verification services respect privacy - that's baked into the whole push for it. Because it's not just about "verifying" people's ages at a specific point in time, especially in the US, it's about being able to prove you have in case anyone tries to sue you.

view more: next ›