[-] lonke@feddit.nu 1 points 1 year ago

By musks account. By Walter Isaacson's account the opposite was the case. Considering musks opposition to aiding the victim, it would be on brand.

[-] lonke@feddit.nu 10 points 1 year ago

Either you give them land from which they can prepare their next attack or you show them that they're unable to take and hold land. So yeah. Pretty much.

[-] lonke@feddit.nu 23 points 1 year ago

It ends the second russia withdraws its troops or they are beaten out of Ukraine.

[-] lonke@feddit.nu 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yup. Russia doesn't understand diplomacy. Only force. It's sad that russia acts this way, so, unfortunately, beating them is the only way to have lasting peace.

That or leadership change but I don't think putler fears anything more than losing power and the people are either weak or live in a propaganda bubble.

[-] lonke@feddit.nu 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No. Russia is 100% in the wrong, continously committing crimes against humanity for no justifiable reason at all.

... that, in the pursuit of taking away Ukrainian freedom and independence.

Hence, to actively disrupt their defense is deeply unethical. He chose to do something rather than nothing, and it directly helps those wishing to make the world a worse place. Disgraceful.

[-] lonke@feddit.nu 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Native procedural dark mode, Developer CSS Overview, browser extension file access.

I use Firefox exclusively except for when the second one is useful. I really wish Firefox had those three though.

[-] lonke@feddit.nu 5 points 1 year ago

Phrasing and content are quite different, even if the points end up being the almost the same.

This post "feels" a great deal more relatable, I don't think AI applies, or at least, I'm not familiar with the issue you are outlining.

[-] lonke@feddit.nu -5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm sure they'd agree wholeheartedly and say nothing to the inverse.

[-] lonke@feddit.nu 1 points 1 year ago

Well, the data it was trained on had a cutoff point in 2021 which would explain that.

I've used it (GPT 3) a fair amount for Unity, and I'm fairly pleased with the results, it's saved me a fair amount of time. Implementing object pooling and editor window dialogues for scene translation management for example.

Of course, programming knowledge is required for it to be of consistent use, which, on second thought, may not be at all obvious.

[-] lonke@feddit.nu 3 points 1 year ago

ChatGPT is GPT 3.5 & GPT 4, as far as I'm aware.

3.5 is also very capable when it comes to programming, for any well known framework or language. It's not as capable, but it is still very capable.

[-] lonke@feddit.nu 5 points 1 year ago

Not everyone with an attention span longer than yours is ChatGPT.

Assuming you've even read THIS far, that comment lacks all of the common gpt hallmarks.

view more: next ›

lonke

joined 1 year ago