The same judge (Southwark) thinks that damage to the eye socket of an off-duty police officer should get a suspended sentence.
But sure, when it's a picture frame, you have to send a message.
mindlesscrollyparrot
joined 2 years ago
Sure. I was just trying to make a slightly pedantic joke to mechoman444.
Exactly. Lack of belief in gods is not the same as actively denying that there are gods.
Surely atheism is the belief in the lack of a god. Agnosticism is the lack of belief in a god.
That's terrible! We should organize a protest.
The 5 bullet points do not sound like slang terms to me.
PieDock
We know perfectly well that the art is behind glass and will not be damaged because they did it before. So it's complete nonsense to say that it will potentially destroy the art.
Losing 2,000 litres of helium is possibly the worst part of this.
The author trying to make a connection is not clarifying which bias Tlaib meant. It is just as likely to be misrepresenting what Tlaib meant.
And, when you think about it, Tlaib said biases - plural - so this 'clarification' - if it was a clarification - is ignoring the other biases.
That is the error that the model made. Your quote talks about the causes of these errors. I asked what caused the model to make this error.
No, indeed. I myself am one of the many millions of people that visit the National Gallery each year to look at the frames.