439
proof (lemmy.ca)
submitted 1 week ago by nave@lemmy.ca to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
12
submitted 2 weeks ago by nave@lemmy.ca to c/technology@lemmy.world
[-] nave@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago

It’s not quite as good as gptk. Gptk can run games like cyberpunk at 60+ fps on more powerful Mac’s but Asahi currently can’t run AAA games at 60 fps. Also gptk has support for avx which Fex technically has but doesn’t work on m1 because the chip lacks SVE(2). However I imagine in the future asahi will almost definitely be better.

[-] nave@lemmy.ca 66 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

This is actually a google account feature called “auto signin”. If you go to google password manager and click on the settings button in the top right there should be an option called Auto Sign-in you can disable.

[-] nave@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago

Apple has their own wine based tool called Game Porting Toolkit that runs windows games and uses Rosetta.

[-] nave@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago

Negotiations for what? YouTubers have pretty much no say in how YouTube runs and they make most of their money outside of YouTube (things like merch and sponsorships).

67
submitted 1 month ago by nave@lemmy.ca to c/technology@lemmy.world

With a new feature called Hype, YouTube is trying to focus on growing the smaller channels and helping people discover and share new creators. Hype is an entirely new promotional system inside of YouTube: there’s a new button for hyping a video, and the most-hyped videos will appear on a platform-wide leaderboard. It’s a bit like Trending, but it’s focused specifically on smaller channels and on what people specifically choose to recommend rather than just what they watch.

The actual mechanism behind Hype is pretty complicated. A video is only eligible to be hyped in the first seven days after it’s published, and of course, if it’s made by a channel with fewer than half a million subscribers. Each user only gets three hypes a week, and each hype is worth a certain number of points that inversely correlates to how many subscribers a given channel has. (The idea is that smaller channels should be able to hit the leaderboard, too, so each hype to a smaller channel will be worth more points — YouTube is doing an awful lot here to try and make sure the biggest channels don’t just dominate the leaderboard.) The 100 videos with the most total points hit the top of the leaderboard.

177
debateposting (lemmy.ca)
submitted 1 month ago by nave@lemmy.ca to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
[-] nave@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 month ago

At the same time, o1 is not as capable as GPT-4o in a lot of areas. It doesn’t do as well on factual knowledge about the world. It also doesn’t have the ability to browse the web or process files and images. Still, the company believes it represents a brand-new class of capabilities. It was named o1 to indicate “resetting the counter back to 1.”

I think it’s more of a proof of concept then a fully functioning model at this point.

187
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by nave@lemmy.ca to c/technology@lemmy.world

For OpenAI, o1 represents a step toward its broader goal of human-like artificial intelligence. More practically, it does a better job at writing code and solving multistep problems than previous models. But it’s also more expensive and slower to use than GPT-4o. OpenAI is calling this release of o1 a “preview” to emphasize how nascent it is.

The training behind o1 is fundamentally different from its predecessors, OpenAI’s research lead, Jerry Tworek, tells me, though the company is being vague about the exact details. He says o1 “has been trained using a completely new optimization algorithm and a new training dataset specifically tailored for it.”

OpenAI taught previous GPT models to mimic patterns from its training data. With o1, it trained the model to solve problems on its own using a technique known as reinforcement learning, which teaches the system through rewards and penalties. It then uses a “chain of thought” to process queries, similarly to how humans process problems by going through them step-by-step.

At the same time, o1 is not as capable as GPT-4o in a lot of areas. It doesn’t do as well on factual knowledge about the world. It also doesn’t have the ability to browse the web or process files and images. Still, the company believes it represents a brand-new class of capabilities. It was named o1 to indicate “resetting the counter back to 1.”

I think this is the most important part (emphasis mine):

As a result of this new training methodology, OpenAI says the model should be more accurate. “We have noticed that this model hallucinates less,” Tworek says. But the problem still persists. “We can’t say we solved hallucinations.”

-80
submitted 2 months ago by nave@lemmy.ca to c/technology@lemmy.world
[-] nave@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago

Weirdly it’s been working better for me.

339
submitted 2 months ago by nave@lemmy.ca to c/technology@lemmy.world
25
submitted 2 months ago by nave@lemmy.ca to c/gaming@lemmy.ml
[-] nave@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago

Doesn’t the game run extremely poorly on ps5?

646
children (lemmy.ca)
submitted 2 months ago by nave@lemmy.ca to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
54
submitted 2 months ago by nave@lemmy.ca to c/gaming@lemmy.ml
351
california (lemmy.ca)
submitted 2 months ago by nave@lemmy.ca to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
901
at least rule (lemmy.ca)
submitted 2 months ago by nave@lemmy.ca to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
[-] nave@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago

I would like to enter for Crisis Core.

[-] nave@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago

Well the songs that the YouTube videos mention are all instrumental so the lyrics aren’t necessary.

[-] nave@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 months ago

not good, let alone capable of passing as human-made music

I disagree. AI music is shockingly good at sounding like real music. Just a couple months ago a popular producer sampled an ai generated song without knowing it.

But soon after, it was revealed that the singer from the “BBL Drizzy” beat didn’t exist — the voice was AI-generated, as was the song itself. The vocals, melody and instrumental of the sample were generated by Udio, an AI music startup founded by former Google Deep Mind engineers. Though Metro was not aware of the source of the track when he used it, his tongue-in-cheek diss became the first notable use case of AI-generated sampling, proving the potential for AI to impact music production. (A representative for Metro Boomin did not respond to *Billboard’s *request for comment).

[-] nave@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 months ago

Hey I have that calculator too!

view more: next ›

nave

joined 1 year ago